/tg/Station 13

Given that the logs didn't really have any relevant information and the lack of acknowledgement for the reason of the ban and the non apologetic nature of the appeal itself, Deadeagle is completely in the right here.

You may re-appeal this after at least 30 days have passed from this post

Sure thing. Try not to chain nade prep again.

Locking.

Moving to resolved.

We've spoken to Draudy and asked them to tone down they're overly uncomfortable speech and conversations. If he continues this he'll be reprimanded and dealt with accordingly.

Moving to resolved.

Unbanned.

Apologies for the wait. It seems like the issue has been resolved as the precedent for 'defences' on tadpole wasn't clear to every admin. Sorry for the unfortunate experience and now that we have set policies regarding this, hopefully it won't happen again.

Locking.

Eh, sure. Don't do this again.

The final ban lifting has been done.

Locking.

Sure, I'll lift it. Please consider cryoing or not negatively impacting the round for either side. Seeing the chat log show 'dnr time' made me suspect soft grief hence the ban.

Locking

You have an extensive note history but given your long break, we're happy to lift this ban though consider yourself on thin ice and thoroughly warned on our rules of escalation.

Sure, be mindful of your actions and respond if you've been messaged by an admin.

Locking thread.

Sure, don't do it again.

Moving to resolved.

Sure, don't do it again.

The fact that you're still referring it as a 'different ontological perspective' AND don't see why this was banworthy just shows Barnet was in the right to ban and deny your appeal. We don't really want such people as a part of our community and you can consider this a quality control ban.

Moving to resolved.

Thanks for the report.

The user has been banned.

Locking thread.

Afking during a ticket asking for a reason to what constitutes as grief will mostly result in a ban. Given cleverslim's history, the ban reduction is lenient.

Note: When vouching, please stick to the facts regarding the incident, otherwise it'll attribute to peanutposting.

Moving to resolved thread.

Otter has been promoted to Head Administrator.

Big Staff Update:

Penezor has joined as an Administrator Candidate.
LuxyLucy has joined as an Administrator Candidate.
Poisonforwin has joined as an Administrator Candidate.
Barnet has joined as an Administrator Candidate.
Dudeman100 / MJP has joined as an Administrator Candidate.

AnotherNobodie ...

Alright this has gone long enough.

Regarding Zaffinomlb, he was unaware of who the person in the picture was and only had it for the Burger King crown effect. From what we've seen, Zaff doesn't encourage nor support racism which is evident by the way he admins and enforces our no racism policy ...

It seems that Soulstolen is inactive for the time being, I shall be taking over this ticket. Apologies for the delay.

It seems that you understand why you were banned, please try not to repeat this again and ahelp any instances of grief or harassment.

Welcome back.

Fair enough, I'll be lifting the ban as a guesture of good faith.

Hey, I'll be taking over this ban appeal.

Your previous appeal was already denied an you'll have to wait for 30 days after bowlofcereal's reply before making another one.
Please refer to our rules regarding ban appeals.

5. The minimum time between re-appealing any kind of ban is 30 days from the ...

Hey there! I'll be handling this.

As long as you can not do that again, should be fine then.

Quick Administration Update:

SphinxIV has rejoined as an Administrator.
Icy5 has rejoined as an Administrator.

Quick Administration Update:

SphinxIV has rejoined as an Administrator.
Icy5 has rejoined as an Administrator.

This has been confirmed that it was an accident as Ohhter modified a different armour value but as it was a datum it modified a lot of other values as well. We apologise for the lack of information and response at the time of the incident and will try to prevent something like this happening again.

Considering this resolved and locking the thread.

It's a role designed for the gameplay you're looking for. They are two different rules indeed which is why we have the ruling. A ship engineer shouldn't really be combatting but we've given leniency to allow them to assist the FOB. The rule is staying for the time being.

Administration Update:

Ohhter has been promote to Trial Administrator.
SpookYeet has been promoted to Trial Administrator.
Zack24 has rejoined as Head Administrator.

SphinxIV has retired.
MereWalker has retired.
Lewdcifer has stepped down from Head Administrator and is now a Senior Administrator.

It's not outated and the only reason they're allowed to deploy is because of the initial leeway given allowing them to deploy. If you don't like the rules regarding the role, you're free to play as a Combat Engineer instead.

You see it as a rule break but in 2 years of playing none of the staff members have raised an issue with it until now. It's a valid way to play that has existed for as long as the roles have. You are making the choice to adhere to an obscure and unenforced rule because? Should be a non-issue ...

Hey there, sorry for the late response.

Regarding the Note, you were actively breaking the rule and aware you were breaking said rule and doing it just because of the lack of enforcement doesn't really make it okay to continue doing so. Players don't always ahelp, admins aren't really always ...

Sure thing!

Welcome back and sorry for the late response.

Administration Update

Zachary09, SphinxIV, and Autisme have also concluded their trials successfully, and are now both Administrators.
Soulstolen was accepted into our team as an Administrator Candidate.
Soulstolen was successful in their candidacy and promoted to Trial Administrator.
Soulstolen ...

Hey,

No worries. Will unban you as soon as I can.

Seeing as this thread has been inactive for a while, I'm locking it.

Locking this thread as it has been resolved.

Sure. Try not to do anything like this again.

Sure, keep in mind just because the server is going down or everyone is having a lighthearted moment, it's still no excuse to use slurs in any chat. I'll be lifting the ban.

Fair enough. While funny, don't blow everything up while we're trying to fix stuff but I'll delete the ban note as well as a show of good faith.

Search found 63 matches