[armhulen] #politics-containment, repeated rule 1 violation
- Stan_Studnick
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2015 11:39 am
- Byond Username: Stan_Studnick
[armhulen] #politics-containment, repeated rule 1 violation
When and where this incident occured (Game Server, forums, Discord): Discord
Byond account and character name OR Discord name: #politics-containment
Admin: armhulen
ROUND ID HERE IF APPLICABLE: N/A
Detailed summary:
On several occasions armhulen felt it was a good idea to wade into an ongoing discussion in #politics-containment channel on the Discord server to rile it up, brow-beat it, and otherwise harass everyone minding their own business. While full of low-brow bullshit, the channel is an open forum for political discussion from all avenues and served as a crossroads and containment and is the opposite of an echo chamber in spite of the allegations. Previously, on two separate occasions, Ordo and I had private conversations regarding the importance of such a place and in particular the vital need for some of the regular visitors to get a dose of opinions contrary to their own.
I am now banned for bringing this up, though I did so out of anger and without the due diligence that would have done our departed friend justice. He would be disappointed in me for acting like a moron in public. That disappointment is my own cross to bear, but this is not an appeal to remove my justified ban. I deserved it. This is a formal complaint against the person who, when faced with the truth, cried to the other problem children with colorful names despite creating the whole situation in the first place.
For those of you who read what I actually typed, not some second-hand or curated nonsense, and were angered I would ask you to consider why you feel that way. I stand by every word I said, even the wrong ones, and because of that I must stand by the feeling in my gut and follow through with this complaint. Thank you for your time.
Byond account and character name OR Discord name: #politics-containment
Admin: armhulen
ROUND ID HERE IF APPLICABLE: N/A
Detailed summary:
On several occasions armhulen felt it was a good idea to wade into an ongoing discussion in #politics-containment channel on the Discord server to rile it up, brow-beat it, and otherwise harass everyone minding their own business. While full of low-brow bullshit, the channel is an open forum for political discussion from all avenues and served as a crossroads and containment and is the opposite of an echo chamber in spite of the allegations. Previously, on two separate occasions, Ordo and I had private conversations regarding the importance of such a place and in particular the vital need for some of the regular visitors to get a dose of opinions contrary to their own.
I am now banned for bringing this up, though I did so out of anger and without the due diligence that would have done our departed friend justice. He would be disappointed in me for acting like a moron in public. That disappointment is my own cross to bear, but this is not an appeal to remove my justified ban. I deserved it. This is a formal complaint against the person who, when faced with the truth, cried to the other problem children with colorful names despite creating the whole situation in the first place.
For those of you who read what I actually typed, not some second-hand or curated nonsense, and were angered I would ask you to consider why you feel that way. I stand by every word I said, even the wrong ones, and because of that I must stand by the feeling in my gut and follow through with this complaint. Thank you for your time.
Last edited by Stan_Studnick on Tue Sep 08, 2020 10:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: [armhulen] #politics-containment, repeated rule 1 violation
What are you actually complaining about.
- Stan_Studnick
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2015 11:39 am
- Byond Username: Stan_Studnick
Re: [armhulen] #politics-containment, repeated rule 1 violation
That armhulen abused a position of power to harass and threaten an entire channel. I'm sorry if I was not crystal clear on that, that seems to be something of a problem I'm having tonight.oranges wrote:What are you actually complaining about.
- Arianya
- In-Game Game Master
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2016 10:27 am
- Byond Username: Arianya
Re: [armhulen] #politics-containment, repeated rule 1 violation
Please use the template provided here: https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=166
(Yes, this also applies to Discord complaints)
(Yes, this also applies to Discord complaints)
Frequently playing as Aria Bollet on Bagil & Scary Terry
Source of avatar is here: https://i.imgur.com/hEkADo6.jpg
Source of avatar is here: https://i.imgur.com/hEkADo6.jpg
- Stan_Studnick
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2015 11:39 am
- Byond Username: Stan_Studnick
Re: [armhulen] #politics-containment, repeated rule 1 violation
The complaint has been edited to comply with the template requirements.Arianya wrote:Please use the template provided here: https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=166
(Yes, this also applies to Discord complaints)
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: [armhulen] #politics-containment, repeated rule 1 violation
You should probably provide some evidence of that then, or indicate when it occurred so the headadmins can see for themselvesStan_Studnick wrote:That armhulen abused a position of power to harass and threaten an entire channel. I'm sorry if I was not crystal clear on that, that seems to be something of a problem I'm having tonight.oranges wrote:What are you actually complaining about.
- Stan_Studnick
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2015 11:39 am
- Byond Username: Stan_Studnick
Re: [armhulen] #politics-containment, repeated rule 1 violation
Fortunately the nature of the complaint indicates where it happened, so despite being banned and unable to gather that evidence, (preventing access to somewhere is, in fact, the whole point of a ban) the headmins and all other interested parties are already aware of the when and where this happened.oranges wrote:You should probably provide some evidence of that then, or indicate when it occurred so the headadmins can see for themselvesStan_Studnick wrote:That armhulen abused a position of power to harass and threaten an entire channel. I'm sorry if I was not crystal clear on that, that seems to be something of a problem I'm having tonight.oranges wrote:What are you actually complaining about.
You knew all of that already, though. After all, several people were banned and kicked for openly disagreeing with what had happened and you were the one who kicked a few of them.
- Armhulen
- Global Moderator
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
- Byond Username: Armhulenn
- Github Username: bazelart
- Location: The Grand Tournament
Re: [armhulen] #politics-containment, repeated rule 1 violation
After sleeping on it, I think this should be given to discord mods instead of an admin complaint, because I did not use any of my powers. Now, he is speaking of my position, and not my powers... but I myself also said multiple times in politics containment that I had no power to delete channels (that would actually be admin abuse). If I wanted and also had the power to remove politics containment, I would.
Tl;dr for the press: I did not use my admin rank for anything, I should be tried as a player
And the next logical conclusion for the moderation team: I do not think discussing deleting a channel in said channel is a palpable issue
I'll be up soon. If this complaint is still up and not handed to discord mods, I'll grab some screenshots that prove I was arguing in good faith for the deletion, and not threatening it
Tl;dr for the press: I did not use my admin rank for anything, I should be tried as a player
And the next logical conclusion for the moderation team: I do not think discussing deleting a channel in said channel is a palpable issue
I'll be up soon. If this complaint is still up and not handed to discord mods, I'll grab some screenshots that prove I was arguing in good faith for the deletion, and not threatening it
- Denton
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 3:53 pm
- Byond Username: Denton-30
- Github Username: 81Denton
Re: [armhulen] #politics-containment, repeated rule 1 violation
Logs for context:
I pruned them to include messages by armhulen/ogremancer and jixijenga/danger/stan_studnick as well as others for context:
I pruned them to include messages by armhulen/ogremancer and jixijenga/danger/stan_studnick as well as others for context:
After this, arm left the channel and jixjenga got banned. Let me know if I missed anything.Spoiler:
Last edited by Denton on Tue Sep 08, 2020 8:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Armhulen
- Global Moderator
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
- Byond Username: Armhulenn
- Github Username: bazelart
- Location: The Grand Tournament
Re: [armhulen] #politics-containment, repeated rule 1 violation
Only thing I'd add for context is that when I say Danger I'm referring to stan stud. I was saying their discord nickname
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: [armhulen] #politics-containment, repeated rule 1 violation
Administrators are under no requirement to pretend they like you, or your favourite discord channel.
This complaint is laughable and should be closed immediately.
This complaint is laughable and should be closed immediately.
- Stan_Studnick
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2015 11:39 am
- Byond Username: Stan_Studnick
Re: [armhulen] #politics-containment, repeated rule 1 violation
No part of this complaint is about either of those irrelevant things, oranges.oranges wrote:Administrators are under no requirement to pretend they like you, or your favourite discord channel.
-
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:21 am
- Byond Username: OhChildflayer
Re: [armhulen] #politics-containment, repeated rule 1 violation
I really hope I'm not peanut-posting when I suggest this.
Wouldn't this whole thing be a non-issue if one of the involved parties simply blocked the other?
Wouldn't this whole thing be a non-issue if one of the involved parties simply blocked the other?
- Coconutwarrior97
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 3:14 am
- Byond Username: Coconutwarrior97
Re: [armhulen] #politics-containment, repeated rule 1 violation
We recognize that the word of admins can by nature tend to carry more weight in regard to discussions such as the potential deletion of a channel. While armhulen did not abuse the tools of his position we believe his actions pushed the boundaries of acceptable admin conduct.
Administrators should not be making posts like this which can rile up a channel:
We have talked to armhulen about his conduct and have asked he refrain from doing this in the future. This complaint is upheld.
Headmin Votes:
Coconutwarrior97: Uphold.
Phuzzylodgik: Uphold.
TWATICUS: Uphold.
Administrators should not be making posts like this which can rile up a channel:
Spoiler:
Headmin Votes:
Coconutwarrior97: Uphold.
Phuzzylodgik: Uphold.
TWATICUS: Uphold.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users