MortoSasye wrote:Maybe reminding (...) security to seek approval of the captain, warden or head of security when making executions >if< available.
The source of this supposed "policy" you quote is
Space law
Capital Crimes wrote:These crimes can result in Execution, Permanent Prison Time, Permanent Labor Camp Time, or Cyborgization.
Only the Captain, HoS, and Warden can authorize a Permanent Sentence.
Only the Captain can authorize an Execution or Forced Cyborgization.
admins have scoffed at players trying to justify their actions with space law before (see Istoprocent1's ban), so we should be able to ignore this as a simple suggestion too
instead, you should adjust your expectations to what is said
here
Security Policy & Precedents wrote:2. Rule 4 of the main rules also apply to security. Security are not exceptions to the rule where non-antagonists can do anything they want, as per rule 4, to antagonists.
3. The 'act like an antag, get treated like one' part of Rule 4 of the main rules also apply to security. Stunning an officer repeatedly, using lethal or restricted weapons on them, disrupting the arrests or sentences of dangerous criminals, or damaging the brig, are examples of behaviour that may make you valid for security under Rule 4. Make sure players deserve it when you treat them as an antag, when in doubt, err on the side of caution as poor behaviour on the part of security will not be tolerated.
of course, it says to make sure players deserve it and that leads to administrative issues, but in my experience when you execute someone as an officer they were past the line of "acting like an antag" beyond any reasonable doubt, and of course, that's what we have admins to determine for anyways
tl;dr: There's no actual rule telling security officers not to execute antagonists, if they're up for execution, they've acted like an antag most probably