[DISCORD] exclamationmark_pigeon - Banned for fulpstation slander

[exclamationpigeon]

BYOND account:[Terraria_Drip_Official]

Ban/note type (Check what applies):
() - Server Ban
() - Note
() - Forum Ban
(/) - Discord Ban

Ban/note length: Permanent, probably
Ban/note reason: None
Time ban was placed: 10 PM CDT 28th of May
Server you were playing on when banned: None
Round ID in which ban was placed: None

Why are you making this appeal?(Check what applies):
() - The ban/note is factually incorrect
(/) - The ban/note is not against the rules
() - The ban/note needs modification
(/) - The ban was unjustifiably harsh
() - I was permabanned and I want another chance

Why should this appeal be accepted?:I said that Fulpstation is only good for griefing, because it's just a worse TG. I accidentally said that I wanted people to go grief it but I got banned before I could clarify (I meant that I think my reasoning is good and that other people would probably agree). I don't think this ban was reasonable because I didn't break any rules and I think I should be able to voice my opinion on different servers.

[Vekter]

Looks like you were banned by omega_darkpotato for "openly stated that people should grief fulp as it's not worth anything else".

I have notified them.

[Omega_DarkPotato]

Denied.

Saying that a server is only good for griefing on repeatedly, including when questioned, does not give me any reason to take "noooo but i didnt mean people *should* actually do what I say it's useful for / thus-should-be-used-for" as any defense that's remotely legitimate.


Re: "I don't think this ban was reasonable because I didn't break any rules"

Code: Select all

2. Do not use this Discord server to break the rules of other communities/servers.

Re: "I think I should be able to voice my opinion on different servers"
"X server sucks" is allowed. "X server is only good because they don't have ban evasion protection so you can grief as much as you want" isn't.

p1.PNG (14.29 KiB) Viewed 1155 times

For additional context, for anyone viewing:

[exclamationpigeon]

I'm not saying that it's good, but that the server is pointless to me. I already said that I didn't mean to direct people to grief.

[exclamationpigeon]

I also think that it's very unprofessional to allow banning admins to review their own ban appeals because it promotes bias. It would require the admin to backpedal and apologize which is especially unlikely for most tg admins (most of you are very stubborn).

[Vekter]

I also think that it's very unprofessional to allow banning admins to review their own ban appeals because it promotes bias. It would require the admin to backpedal and apologize which is especially unlikely for most tg admins (most of you are very stubborn).

There have been several instances this month alone of admins removing notes that they felt, in hindsight, weren't appropriate.

[Omega_DarkPotato]

I'm not saying that it's good, but that the server is pointless to me. I already said that I didn't mean to direct people to grief.

I've already said that with the other context I find "but I didn't mean it" to be highly unlikely. Again, this appeal's denied, but you're free to get headmin review if you still have an issue with my ruling. Otherwise, you're free to reappeal in a year.

[Omega_DarkPotato]

Marking as closed if I don't hear anything back in the next 48 hours.