Bottom post of the previous page:
There's more

(talking generally here, not about you personally)Reeeee wrote:I keep him cus he's one of the few alt sources information who constantly shits on mainstream and is self critical to the point is kinda demeaning.Actionb wrote: Depending on what you watch and get influenced by, you get a total different view of the situation.
You can't really skim someone and make statements about what he is either. He's being accused of being both left/right at the same time which makes him pretty centrist tbh. Rather that than CNN telling me i should kill x and journalists defending looting as some sort of universal right.
I don't get where he's defending anything other than his opinion that you are free to ignore.
Also, people aren't left or right, they just want to grill and go to the mall without getting shot.
He's painting the wrong picture, either because of his bias or deliberately. Or both.If you care more about Trump taking a picture (they mainly condemned him for clearing the way) in front of the church than the fact that far-left extremists (unproven) tried to destroy a church last night (somebody lit a fire in the basement that did minor damage). Then you are part of the problem (oof, generalize and strawman much??).
I'm not giving you my personal opinion (implying it's FACTS; i.e. I'm not free to ignore it), I will just tell you this:
Trump didn't apparently order any protestor to be gassed (apparently pepperballs and smoke grenades were used; same effect in that situation) or anything like that.
It was curfew (it wasn't; curfew was at 7pm, police cleared half an hour earlier (also note how the camera man is being assaulted)).
Grazyn wrote: Not a fan of "well if breitbart news says Biden is a pedo and MSNBC says he isn't, maybe the truth lies somewhere in between"
You can just accept you will never know the truth and move on instead of getting intentionally misguided by averaging out every extreme point of view.
Because at that point they can start shooting back. Military don't swear to defend a leader or position. But he constitution. So if things ever get to the point where the general public starts a literal armed rebellion. The military is likely going to toss out the incumbent. Rather than slaughter the population.Grazyn wrote:What I don't understand is why rioters are using sticks, stones and firebombs instead of actual guns. Isn't the 2nd amendment meant to fight the authoritarian government when it starts oppressing you?
I said you have to use your fuckin brain to construct the truth out of different viewpoints. I shouldn't be surprised you couldn't even manage to do that to read a single post and jumped to "he must mean you just average everything together into a truth soup".Actionb wrote:Grazyn wrote: Not a fan of "well if breitbart news says Biden is a pedo and MSNBC says he isn't, maybe the truth lies somewhere in between"
You can just accept you will never know the truth and move on instead of getting intentionally misguided by averaging out every extreme point of view.
So they're not gonna react as long as they use everything but guns? I suppose the strategy is to wait until rioters get bored and go home having looted and destroyed everything they could, then move in and go door to door arresting everyone identified from video surveillance.Jack7D1 wrote:Because at that point they can start shooting back. Military don't swear to defend a leader or position. But he constitution. So if things ever get to the point where the general public starts a literal armed rebellion. The military is likely going to toss out the incumbent. Rather than slaughter the population.Grazyn wrote:What I don't understand is why rioters are using sticks, stones and firebombs instead of actual guns. Isn't the 2nd amendment meant to fight the authoritarian government when it starts oppressing you?
This also isn't the middle east so it's possible to make change without violence.
Unless your 1/10th rapist example was only meant as a strawman, it is perfect for showing why "moving on until more information is available" can be better than trying to "construct the truth out of different viewpoints".Timbrewolf wrote: I said you have to use your fuckin brain to construct the truth out of different viewpoints. I shouldn't be surprised you couldn't even manage to do that to read a single post and jumped to "he must mean you just average everything together into a truth soup".
If one outlet is calling someone a child rapist and nobody else is acknowledging or reporting on it you dont conclude that they are like 1/10th child rapist.
Watching people in here purposely dive on the most retarded interpretation of everything they read is painful.
I'm convinced you use that picture of a cat as your forum avatar because you identify with the need to wear a helmet.
Franklin, a burglary suspect, unarmed and 173 pounds, was found hiding in a basement by five officers who unleashed a dog on him. His family’s attorneys say an officer’s semiautomatic weapon accidentally went off, hitting two officers in the legs, and police responded by shooting and killing Franklin in anger. [...]
Kroll said that a good friend of his had killed Franklin: “stepped up and shot him in the head at close range.”
“The Franklin one was near and dear to my heart because he shot two friends of mine, and a very good friend of mine was the one who shot and killed him in the confrontation,” Kroll said.
My prediction is the three cops that sat on him are gonna get convicted of manslaughter and the cop that was talking to the crowd is gonna get off.Grazyn wrote:Turns out Floyd had the 'rona. Combined with pre-existing conditions, "I can't breathe", I think the cop's trial will be fun to watch. Second wave of riots predicted when the cop is found not guilty.
Thanks for your contribution to the discussioniksyp wrote:oh hey i just read through the thread nice to know that people want others to die because of how they generalize said group very cool guys thank you for solving racism o7
that is gonna piss people off so much oh my godXSI wrote:They upgraded the cop's charges to second degree murder
He's going to get off unless they can somehow get the entire jury to be protestors and antifa
nah they should kill him publicallyArmhulen wrote:that is gonna piss people off so much oh my godXSI wrote:They upgraded the cop's charges to second degree murder
He's going to get off unless they can somehow get the entire jury to be protestors and antifa
though one of the cops was really new to the team and told the guy to get off george's neck so I think he should be let go tbh
Protests where the police were violent, and the protestors were not, are the ones who result in the longest term social change.XivilaiAnaxes wrote:Assaulting the banks is a good way to get your ass killed - it also wouldn't do anything since the majority of cash flow is digital.
What do the Cop's lawyer say?Actionb wrote:Minneapolis Police Union President: “I’ve Been Involved in Three Shootings Myself, and Not a One of Them Has Bothered Me”
https://theintercept.com/2020/06/02/min ... shootings/
> His family’s attorneys say
thot_slayer wrote:don't be a degenerate online if you don't want people to treat you like a degenerate morty
bandit wrote:what is this
a correct post by pillz
https://southsidepride.com/2013/10/29/h ... ranklin-2/Helios wrote: What do the Cop's lawyer say?
If you only listen to the prosecutor, or only listen to the defense attorney you're going to get a very skewed idea of a case.
what the fuck does this meanJack7D1 wrote:Four officers with lethals trained on a guy. Guy pulls out gun
"Shoot, Shoot, Shoot to kill"
Some guys had the grand idea to only shoot twice.
Boris wrote:Sticky is a jackass who has worms where his brain should be, but he also gets exactly what SS13 should be
terranaut wrote:i dont get how people still fall for it
Mothblocks, winter 2020, “successfully” preventing bagil death with relevant data wrote:You seem to be under the fallacy that reinforcing that Bagil is a TDM shithole where you must carry bolas and spears on you at all times, while looking for the next valid to hunt down is a positive change to the server. I don't. The data suggests other people don't.
imsxz wrote:I give up there’s too many furries
cacogen wrote:i asked oranges how often he plays and he deleted the post
cybersaber101 wrote:Welp, you guys let a terrymin become a headmin, thousand years of darkness.
Vekter wrote:I jerk off Nist a bit too much but he's honestly one of the best silicon players on the server. B.O.R.G.O. is also pretty good.
Flatulent wrote:but there is raaaaacccciiiissssmmmm how can you not understaaaaand
Mothblocks, winter 2020, “successfully” preventing bagil death with relevant data wrote:You seem to be under the fallacy that reinforcing that Bagil is a TDM shithole where you must carry bolas and spears on you at all times, while looking for the next valid to hunt down is a positive change to the server. I don't. The data suggests other people don't.
imsxz wrote:I give up there’s too many furries
cacogen wrote:i asked oranges how often he plays and he deleted the post
cybersaber101 wrote:Welp, you guys let a terrymin become a headmin, thousand years of darkness.
Vekter wrote:I jerk off Nist a bit too much but he's honestly one of the best silicon players on the server. B.O.R.G.O. is also pretty good.
Oookay.Actionb wrote:..and you might get an idea why something like antifa is actually necessary.
I'm just curious what they will say.Flatulent wrote:it’s literally just a publicity stunt what is there not to understand
there is global awareness about this blm stuff, Canadians and Dutch have been determined to care about this by Uber analysing their userbase’s google search results
for example I didnt get any such mail from Uber and I live in place where we simply don’t give a shit about American police strangling black people
there were also blm protests in Amsterdam and Canada so I suppose that matters as well
No, it wasn't (only) because I didn't like what he was saying - I was using him as an example for how an initially centrist audience can be aligned towards the right by 'apparently liberal' content creators who are actually biased towards the right.Reeeee wrote:Wait did someone defend antifa because he doesn't like what some guy on youtube is posting?
Fist world countries like US don't *need* violent and insurrectionist naysayer cults shitting on their fellow people cus of politics
lol shut up thugActionb wrote:No, it wasn't (only) because I didn't like what he was saying - I was using him as an example for how an initially centrist audience can be aligned towards the right by 'apparently liberal' content creators who are actually biased towards the right.Reeeee wrote:Wait did someone defend antifa because he doesn't like what some guy on youtube is posting?
Fist world countries like US don't *need* violent and insurrectionist naysayer cults shitting on their fellow people cus of politics
Put certain right-wing people in a somewhat favourable light, maybe do a few interviews, or simply talk about them while simultaneously portraying their opposition as bad. Everything done one-sided and incrementally, and the content creators may set the stage for content that is more right. Why this usually applies towards the right and not the left is explained in the video I have posted.
How much that particular youtuber actually means to contribute to this matters little and I don't really care about him personally. Again, just an example, because I think he does contribute (anti-MSM, anti-left video titles, Anti-Antifa, alt-light or alt-right figures like Peterson, McInnes).
"Oh you're overreacting!" - well, am I? Right wing has moved its 'recruitment' pretty much entirely to the internet. And it's paying off thanks to the alt-right pipeline:
https://www.tubefilter.com/2019/08/26/y ... niversity/
https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/f ... 10108/7920
Also Antifa isn't simply all about thugs and hooligans, but also about information gathering and monitoring. If you've only heard about the former, get a change of perspective.
If you can't see how all this applies to the current situation or what role Antifa might play in this:
white supremacist infiltration of us police forces
who are antifa (US)
And even if you don't care about what is happening in the US, this move to the right is happening in a lot of places in various degrees: Brazil, Hungary, Poland, Germany, UK, France, Turkey. Even the Dutch send their "Holland-Hitler" cosplayer over to take part in a Nazi demo last summer in the city where I live.
We've had exactly one case in recent history of a cop shooting someone(an arab, not black) and it resulted in the cop getting slammed by everyone and removed from the force+chargesHelios wrote:There's no statistically significant disproportionate shooting of Black Canadians, or Black Dutch.
Antifa, for all they pretend to be, are nothing but cunts and faggots and have very little to do with freedom of information, and more to do with being a small minded politically corrupted sons of bitches who want to hurt others for their views. Freedom of information and dissemination of it happens elsewhere, (wikileaks, etc) not in garage meetings of politically biased fucktards who are screaming to each other they are right and apply to everything they see a political overcoat that they then disseminate as being the ONLY truth and view to hold going forward.Actionb wrote:...
the fuck am i even supposed to contribute at this point?Super Aggro Crag wrote:Thanks for your contribution to the discussioniksyp wrote:oh hey i just read through the thread nice to know that people want others to die because of how they generalize said group very cool guys thank you for solving racism o7
dont take it as a personal attackiksyp wrote:the fuck am i even supposed to contribute at this point?Super Aggro Crag wrote:Thanks for your contribution to the discussioniksyp wrote:oh hey i just read through the thread nice to know that people want others to die because of how they generalize said group very cool guys thank you for solving racism o7
like, "oh wow rioters bad police bad" no shit, cops need to be held more accountable, and people need to focus on more peaceful methods, but i haven't seen a single person who doesn't hold this stance
and to anyone who says "PEACEFUL PROTESTING DOESN'T WORK!!! IT TOOK 3 DAYS OF RIOTS!!!" there weren't even 3 days of peaceful protests.
Reeeee wrote: Antifa, for all they pretend to be, are nothing but cunts and faggots and have very little to do with freedom of information, and more to do with being a small minded politically corrupted sons of bitches who want to hurt others for their views.
XSI wrote: >Someone in here unironically defending antifa
Extremist shits who would maim or kill anyone that disagreed with them without hesitation if they had any real power
Code: Select all
small-minded,/smɔːlˈmʌɪndɪd/, adjective
having or showing rigid opinions or a narrow outlook; petty.
said links cemented my view as antifa being domestic terrorists. I didn't know before, now i do. You made my view what it was. I'm not going to give you the time of day if you think there's a discussion to be had about them NOT being such.Actionb wrote:A lot of shit you raise is being addressed in the links I have given. I'm not quite sure how I should get through to you to be able to talk about it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users