Banning admin: MrAlphonzo
Ban type (What are you banned from?): Main Server Ban
Ban reason and length: You have been banned by MrAlphonzo from the server.
Reason: Ban baiting and lies of omission in ahelps is bad. Whats even worse is excusing literally every single one of your bans as inconsistent enforcement of the rules.
This ban is permanent. The round ID is 110315.
Time ban was placed (including time zone): 2019-06-11 04:37:02 GMT +5
Server you were playing when banned (Sybil or Bagil): Sybil
Your side of the story:
I initially opened the ahelp ticket after a warden player (James Jameson) had begun to beat me to death after already having me cuffed and subdued- though he only got as far as to crit me nearly to death, the initial response I got was "You aren't dead so there's nothing I can do." Granted, he had subdued me after I attacked him with a sword, however with reference to the "security Rule 1 extension" this still seemed to be a violation of the rules. Thus, I began to press the issue as A) said warden player continued to use lethal means on me in situations where it was more than reasonable to use nonlethal- setting his egun to lethal while chasing after me, when I'm not only disarmed but CUFFED, and dragging me all the way around to medical to get healed (the Captain was the only reason he had not killed me already, he had expressed an incredible degree of agitation upon seeing Jameson clubbing me to death in brig as I was defenseless). MrAlphonzo, rather confusingly, ruled that because I had initially attacked the Warden with the intention to kill him that made it perfectly legitimate to use lethal means on me AFTER having been subdued and unable to fight back. AFter the Warden had finally decided to summarily execute me in the brig (Alphonzo justified this other action because I told the warden "suck my dick" which strikes me as rather ridiculous) MrAlphonzo decides to push 'banbaiting' on me- and not only that, but expected me to justify my PREVIOUS bans and then proceeded to punish me for said previous bans on top of his charge of 'banbaiting' (so much for "notes are not a punishment").
A rather antagonistic response to me trying to justify my stance.PM to-Admins: Rule 1 of the main rules apply to security. The only exception is that security is generally considered to be armed with non-lethal methods to control a situation. Therefore, where reasonably possible, security is expected to use non-lethal methods first in a conflict before escalating to lethal methods.
-- Administrator private message --
Admin PM from-MrAlphonzo: Are you really lecturing me on the rules I have spent 2 years enforcing?
Why you think you should be unbanned: I don't think I should be expected to exhaustively cover every detail of the situation in order to avoid being accused of "lying by omission" OR that I should be forced to justify all of my previous bans on pain of PERMABAN. Calling this ban over the top would be underselling it.