Bottom post of the previous page:
Limey wrote:you drive me to drink godsring
Bottom post of the previous page:
Limey wrote:you drive me to drink godsring
You mean license complying, legally binding, contractually expected thing.DemonFiren wrote:It's not about offering, it's about publishing whether your code is currently wanted or not.
That would have been the right thing.
The license is the warning.godsring wrote:Should have followed the license before we without warning DMCAed you lul
Offering *US* the code isn't making it open source.godsring wrote:I would understand better where you are coming from regarding the disrespect but I did offer the code. I feel that is in the spirit of open source.
Asking to have the thread locked will only ensure the thread remains open. Best to leave and wait for us to forget.godsring wrote:Well it is over now, is it not? The source is released I had not hosted it since the DMCA you feel me offering was not enough but now its said and done? Why must hostility continue? The whole situation is done and over the source was released? What more is that you as a community want just to continue being angry that there was a bit of miscommunication and understand and to what benefit does it give anyone to continue being upset about it. Lets lock the thread and ends the hate yes?
You did kind of open yourself up for attack by coming here and taking a while to openly and clearly admit you done goofed.godsring wrote:Well it is over now, is it not? The source is released I had not hosted it since the DMCA you feel me offering was not enough but now its said and done? Why must hostility continue? The whole situation is done and over the source was released? What more is that you as a community want just to continue being angry that there was a bit of miscommunication and understand and to what benefit does it give anyone to continue being upset about it. Lets lock the thread and ends the hate yes?
I actually have to speak in his defense here, this is no reason for us to mirror that kind of behaviour.ohnopigeons wrote:It's pretty apparent you and your discord team have been acting in bad faith throughout this whole ordeal. Even now hostility still exists on your side in your discord.
godsring wrote:All I honestly wanted to see from the beginning is compliance with the license and to have the hub taken down till he gets compliant that is all..its a shame things have had to come this far... he is trying so hard to bypass just doing such a simple thing...it wont hurt him in anyway or even prevent him from making money.. in all reality it protects him
godsring wrote:My intent was purely to protect my content and make sure the GPL was fully enforced...
holy fuck i don't even have a lizard picture for thiscallanrockslol wrote:I JUST FOUND A THREAD WITH GODSRING COMPLAINING ABOUT GPL NOT BEING FOLLOWED THE CIRCLE HAS CLOSED
THIS JUICY HYPOCRACY SUSTAINS ME
godsring wrote:All I honestly wanted to see from the beginning is compliance with the license and to have the hub taken down till he gets compliant that is all..its a shame things have had to come this far... he is trying so hard to bypass just doing such a simple thing...it wont hurt him in anyway or even prevent him from making money.. in all reality it protects himgodsring wrote:My intent was purely to protect my content and make sure the GPL was fully enforced...
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahacallanrockslol wrote:I JUST FOUND A THREAD WITH GODSRING COMPLAINING ABOUT GPL NOT BEING FOLLOWED THE CIRCLE HAS CLOSED
THIS JUICY HYPOCRACY SUSTAINS ME
godsring wrote:All I honestly wanted to see from the beginning is compliance with the license and to have the hub taken down till he gets compliant that is all..its a shame things have had to come this far... he is trying so hard to bypass just doing such a simple thing...it wont hurt him in anyway or even prevent him from making money.. in all reality it protects himgodsring wrote:My intent was purely to protect my content and make sure the GPL was fully enforced...
tusterman11 wrote:Can you stop lying? I just asked you and you are was a piece of shiit on me!!!
EngamerAzari's real number one fangirl <3Kor wrote:I wish Wyzack was still an admin.
tusterman11 wrote:Can you stop lying? I just asked you and you are was a piece of shiit on me!!!
EngamerAzari's real number one fangirl <3Kor wrote:I wish Wyzack was still an admin.
I don't wanna bring the subject myself, as to not provoke them. But I can bring it up once it's relevantWyzack wrote:If anyone is still in the FO13 discord they should link to that
callanrockslol wrote:I JUST FOUND A THREAD WITH GODSRING COMPLAINING ABOUT GPL NOT BEING FOLLOWED THE CIRCLE HAS CLOSED
THIS JUICY HYPOCRACY SUSTAINS ME
godsring wrote:All I honestly wanted to see from the beginning is compliance with the license and to have the hub taken down till he gets compliant that is all..its a shame things have had to come this far... he is trying so hard to bypass just doing such a simple thing...it wont hurt him in anyway or even prevent him from making money.. in all reality it protects himgodsring wrote:My intent was purely to protect my content and make sure the GPL was fully enforced...
The jury is still out on that, from a casual glance i did earlier, it seemed like the legacy version that was hosted on github, had agpl code, i just haven't had the time to do a full check, nor confirm that your version had it, nor confirm that you have modifications that aren't on the githubgodsring wrote:Well it is over now, is it not? The source is released I had not hosted it since the DMCA you feel me offering was not enough but now its said and done?
I can allow you access to access the situation as I have nothing to hide in regards to not using your AGPL licensed code.MrStonedOne wrote:The jury is still out on that, from a casual glance i did earlier, it seemed like the legacy version that was hosted on github, had agpl code, i just haven't had the time to do a full check, nor confirm that your version had it, nor confirm that you have modifications that aren't on the githubgodsring wrote:Well it is over now, is it not? The source is released I had not hosted it since the DMCA you feel me offering was not enough but now its said and done?
Considering development began in 2014 on that git I do not believe so.MrStonedOne wrote:https://github.com/BartNixon/Fallout13/ ... /master.dm https://github.com/BartNixon/Fallout13/ ... bsystem.dm
This has dynamic wait, something that was made after agpl
I mostly just wanted to point out your hypocrisy. MSO said you could just require forks of your work to state that they're running off modified versions of your game but apparently that's a horrible inconvenience for you despite the fact that you asked Jolenar to do the same thing several months ago.godsring wrote:Again I am "not" in violation of any licenses or even any supposed licenses neither have I been in several weeks.
As well I would like to note that I did not verbally attack Jolenar when they did what they did to me.
I calmly and professionally handled the situation which "he" brought to the public forums and I won justice without being insulting or immature about it.
It doesn't matter when development began, though? It just matters that the dynamic wait code is AGPL.godsring wrote:Considering development began in 2014 on that git I do not believe so.MrStonedOne wrote:https://github.com/BartNixon/Fallout13/ ... /master.dm https://github.com/BartNixon/Fallout13/ ... bsystem.dm
This has dynamic wait, something that was made after agpl
It may be AGPL now but back in 2014 when it was in the source it surely was not. I have not went over the commit but I do not see how we could get the AGPL content back in 2014 we dont have a time machineChangelingRain wrote:It doesn't matter when development began, though? It just matters that the dynamic wait code is AGPL.godsring wrote:Considering development began in 2014 on that git I do not believe so.MrStonedOne wrote:https://github.com/BartNixon/Fallout13/ ... /master.dm https://github.com/BartNixon/Fallout13/ ... bsystem.dm
This has dynamic wait, something that was made after agpl
Relevant PRs;
Dynamic Wait: https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/pull/9231
AGPL: https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/pull/6689
Please look at the timestamps on the pr mergedates, you will find it illuminating. Since you do not have a time machine, the dynamic wait code is AGPL.godsring wrote:It may be AGPL now but back in 2014 when it was in the source it surely was not. I have not went over the commit but I do not see how we could get the AGPL content back in 2014 we dont have a time machineChangelingRain wrote:It doesn't matter when development began, though? It just matters that the dynamic wait code is AGPL.godsring wrote:Considering development began in 2014 on that git I do not believe so.MrStonedOne wrote:https://github.com/BartNixon/Fallout13/ ... /master.dm https://github.com/BartNixon/Fallout13/ ... bsystem.dm
This has dynamic wait, something that was made after agpl
Relevant PRs;
Dynamic Wait: https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/pull/9231
AGPL: https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/pull/6689
Or you know, make it open source.godsring wrote:Oh hmm alright if this is true I will be deleting the source and shutting down the project as I currently do not have the financial means to fight this in court. Have a nice day.
Or just provide that snippet from your copy, it's entirely possible your copy doesn't have it? Instead of throwing a temper tantrum.godsring wrote:Oh hmm alright if this is true I will be deleting the source and shutting down the project as I currently do not have the financial means to fight this in court. Have a nice day.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAgodsring wrote:Oh hmm alright if this is true I will be deleting the source and shutting down the project as I currently do not have the financial means to fight this in court. Have a nice day.
ausops wrote:apart from this there is literally nothing more to say other than that this is the first thread in five years to have achieved something.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users