Bottom post of the previous page:
Is this the thread where I talk about the loss of depth and interaction because everyone starts with literally everything they could ever want to do their job in terms of what maps provide players roundstart?Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
- Cobby
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:19 pm
- Byond Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobby
- Github Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobblestone
-
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 10:26 pm
- Byond Username: KorPhaeron
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
I'm not being obtuse. Planet station is still set in sci-fi, with a space ship crash, and an alien world, and alien ruins, so he's not talking about space the setting, he's talking about space itself, the empty nothing we literally have in our game and surrounding our station for 9 z levels.
- Qbopper
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2015 6:34 pm
- Byond Username: Qbopper
- Github Username: Qbopper
- Location: Canada
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
things in space are what is exciting, but the fact that there's so much in between the exciting things makes putting stuff in space to explore a poor decision imobandit wrote:come on kor now you're just being willfully obtuse are you not familiar with literally 75% of science fiction
Limey wrote:its too late.
- Cobby
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:19 pm
- Byond Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobby
- Github Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobblestone
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
not having anything static regarding space really did it in.Qbopper wrote:things in space are what is exciting, but the fact that there's so much in between the exciting things makes putting stuff in space to explore a poor decision imobandit wrote:come on kor now you're just being willfully obtuse are you not familiar with literally 75% of science fiction
Voted best trap in /tg/ 2014-current
- Qbopper
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2015 6:34 pm
- Byond Username: Qbopper
- Github Username: Qbopper
- Location: Canada
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
also this, there's no way to know where anything interesting is or if you'll even make it back to the station, everything is designed to make gameplay on the station interesting, I don't see why we should make features for lone explorers to fuck off and ignore the round withExcessiveCobblestone wrote:not having anything static regarding space really did it in.Qbopper wrote:things in space are what is exciting, but the fact that there's so much in between the exciting things makes putting stuff in space to explore a poor decision imobandit wrote:come on kor now you're just being willfully obtuse are you not familiar with literally 75% of science fiction
I already feel strongly about lavaland, this is that x1000 because at least lavaland has them collecting minerals for science/etc.
Limey wrote:its too late.
- bandit
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 7:35 pm
- Byond Username: Bgobandit
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
This is another cause, yes. (You could also put in traitor uplinks/ling powers/etc providing traitors with literally everything they could ever want roundstart.)ExcessiveCobblestone wrote:Is this the thread where I talk about the loss of depth and interaction because everyone starts with literally everything they could ever want to do their job in terms of what maps provide players roundstart?
- cedarbridge
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 12:24 am
- Byond Username: Cedarbridge
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
That was required because telesci space looting was too strong with static coordinates. What really kills space exploration is the huge blank z-level of nothing but stars we have specifically to make the space levels feel further apart.ExcessiveCobblestone wrote:not having anything static regarding space really did it in.Qbopper wrote:things in space are what is exciting, but the fact that there's so much in between the exciting things makes putting stuff in space to explore a poor decision imobandit wrote:come on kor now you're just being willfully obtuse are you not familiar with literally 75% of science fiction
- FantasticFwoosh
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 11:25 pm
- Byond Username: FantasticFwoosh
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
So you just want to have a static station that never expands (building on ground tiles, not even broadly interesting space atmos) working out, no space suits, nearly no escape shuttle (you've already discussed the functions of removing calling shuttle or making it a deadly serious thing that can't be recalled in a thread somewhere else) no travelling through space or greater exploration, we'd be stuck on 1 z level in its current form and only able to walk/teleport off it possibly later on.Kor wrote:I'm not being obtuse. Planet station is still set in sci-fi, with a space ship crash, and an alien world, and alien ruins, so he's not talking about space the setting, he's talking about space itself, the empty nothing we literally have in our game and surrounding our station for 9 z levels.
Somehow this is kind of backwards to depth by pushing it inside a increasingly smaller box just to fit a narrative that's been written up in your sci-fi universal lore. (Ironically the station is a box, but there is a lot of space around the box) Its like asking people to drink flavoured water at Oktoberfest because people getting drunk is causing societal problems without cancelling the event because the festivity has been compromised by people who dislike & reject one thing over another.
> The lack of answers to Boss monsters, how to fix chasms caused by super huge explosions really screwing up and spawnkilling/irreclaimable and lava (which dumping bodies in is a bannable offence) burning everything & everyone to a crisp plus long burning times on lava often causing chain infernos needs to be addressed before we ever take that idea literally. Remove any of those aspects and its not lavaland and you're sort of betraying the premise.
The singularity/tesla wouldn't work because space is the base turf tile and eventually if you destroy the planet enough past a chasm you reveal space, without making literally a seperate server or game folder its impractical.
There's that too, we don't have the tools to exercise our depths by really TRYING us because we just spam mutagen/disks for easy genetics because its easier to meta, from talking to folks, most coders are shitters who usually make things to benefit their own personal playstyles and gripes.ExcessiveCobblestone wrote:Is this the thread where I talk about the loss of depth and interaction because everyone starts with literally everything they could ever want to do their job in terms of what maps provide players roundstart?
> Endless tweaks to heads that code maintainers actually had to step in and lay down the law to stop touching that shit, mekhi crying non stop over RD teleporting armor nerf, botany memes, medbay is a profession for braindeads when there is a cure for everything usually in a pill. Mappers add rooms implied for RP just for aesthetic then shove it full of loot. Metastation has a lot of stuff, maybe too much stuff.
You could try making the station design much looser so that certain areas are actually cross z level to encourage moving in (most players have never even left the station map) like how the asteroid used to be with a air of consistency that made the base 'Hub' of the station (but thats obviously obscured by the pseudo space movement rules without taking special teleport pipes known as griefable shuttles)
Spoiler:
- Qbopper
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2015 6:34 pm
- Byond Username: Qbopper
- Github Username: Qbopper
- Location: Canada
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
I can't reply fully right now but for the record building anything off the station is rarely a thing that happens (from my experience)
Limey wrote:its too late.
- FantasticFwoosh
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 11:25 pm
- Byond Username: FantasticFwoosh
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
Neither have the tools (lots of sheets of everything/planning) or the time, though mining shelters make good starting point prefabs because they are ventilated.Qbopper wrote:I can't reply fully right now but for the record building anything off the station is rarely a thing that happens (from my experience)
Also to what purpose? Usually its done to hide something or work discreetly.
Spoiler:
- cedarbridge
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 12:24 am
- Byond Username: Cedarbridge
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
Because fun is banned. Anything interesting you build will be bombed, griefed, or have a shuttle called over a stubbed toe before its finished. I lament that there's just not a lot of excitement for building projects, but It really just feels like a symptom of the bigger problem that the collective server attention span has gotten shorter.Qbopper wrote:I can't reply fully right now but for the record building anything off the station is rarely a thing that happens (from my experience)
- FantasticFwoosh
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 11:25 pm
- Byond Username: FantasticFwoosh
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
A directionless sandbox for griefers until shuttle is called (they are all rollin4antag)cedarbridge wrote:Because fun is banned. Anything interesting you build will be bombed, griefed, or have a shuttle called over a stubbed toe before its finished. I lament that there's just not a lot of excitement for building projects, but It really just feels like a symptom of the bigger problem that the collective server attention span has gotten shorter.Qbopper wrote:I can't reply fully right now but for the record building anything off the station is rarely a thing that happens (from my experience)
Spoiler:
-
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 10:26 pm
- Byond Username: KorPhaeron
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
Building structures on a planet is far easier than building and pressurizing them in space, and building will be far more practical and rewarding when the station actually serves an end goal rather than something you can freely abandon at the first sign of trouble.
- FantasticFwoosh
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 11:25 pm
- Byond Username: FantasticFwoosh
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
But literally why would you want to build it when mappers do all the work for you giving you a detailed station & maint? Time to go dwarf fortress mode on ya'll and start off with only a 10x10 small prefab base on a rogue planet with a depleting plasma generator, its literally the only way that'd work and even then griefers would ruin it 5 minutes flat by throwing syndiebombs around and crumbling the whole station (full built/prefab or not maxcaps also work) in to a chasm.
Because admins are so whiny about spacemen never leaving the station, all the jobs are packaged into the station (leading to "Owo what's this" additions to mining which is still free to outward content expansion). Hence why ideas like explorers get shot down because space is full of emptyness and coders don't put things out of reach to be found.
Xenoarcheology on VG discreetly & randomly puts things in rocks to be found which adds depth to science in decoding what those objects are and how to use them (like our anomalous meme crystal for a short while) without giving them to you on a plate or even a guranteed chance to see them. People work for hours on xenobiology in much the same way as a invested process even though redistribution of what you make is slow.
Because admins are so whiny about spacemen never leaving the station, all the jobs are packaged into the station (leading to "Owo what's this" additions to mining which is still free to outward content expansion). Hence why ideas like explorers get shot down because space is full of emptyness and coders don't put things out of reach to be found.
Xenoarcheology on VG discreetly & randomly puts things in rocks to be found which adds depth to science in decoding what those objects are and how to use them (like our anomalous meme crystal for a short while) without giving them to you on a plate or even a guranteed chance to see them. People work for hours on xenobiology in much the same way as a invested process even though redistribution of what you make is slow.
Spoiler:
-
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 10:26 pm
- Byond Username: KorPhaeron
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
We do sometimes, but players figured out it's easier to ask admins to spawn them in a TC trade than to go looking for themcoders don't put things out of reach to be found.
- FantasticFwoosh
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 11:25 pm
- Byond Username: FantasticFwoosh
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
There's a big problem there then isn't there if you just blurt out your biggest secrets there and then, wasting the time and effort to conceal it in the first place.
Spoiler:
- Shaps-cloud
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2014 4:25 am
- Byond Username: Shaps
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
What is open source codebase
- Qbopper
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2015 6:34 pm
- Byond Username: Qbopper
- Github Username: Qbopper
- Location: Canada
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
if you're trying to say "we can't have secrets because open source" that's a strawman argument, there's more to having secrets than "put the item in a corner of maint"Shaps wrote:What is open source codebase
Limey wrote:its too late.
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
This thread is supposed to be about how we can put in place a structure that supports depth and focus, not an ideas thread for deep mechanics.
- cedarbridge
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 12:24 am
- Byond Username: Cedarbridge
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
So instead of stating your goal, try giving direction to what you would consider an answer to your question instead of restating the question.oranges wrote:This thread is supposed to be about how we can put in place a structure that supports depth and focus, not an ideas thread for deep mechanics.
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
If I knew the answer to the question I wouldn't be asking it
- Not-Dorsidarf
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:14 pm
- Byond Username: Dorsidwarf
- Location: We're all going on an, admin holiday
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
Here's my suggestion for making the command staff less toe-stubby
Station scores.
The station, with the command staff named (and probbably shamed), get given a point total at the end of the round depending on lots of factors, such as "the number of bloody tiles", "The length of the shift", "total R&D levels" and stuff.
If the point level is too low, the command staff are ridiculed.
If its high enough, they're praised.
People like making numbers bigger and having their name next to a green "successful!", it could help.
Station scores.
The station, with the command staff named (and probbably shamed), get given a point total at the end of the round depending on lots of factors, such as "the number of bloody tiles", "The length of the shift", "total R&D levels" and stuff.
If the point level is too low, the command staff are ridiculed.
If its high enough, they're praised.
People like making numbers bigger and having their name next to a green "successful!", it could help.


kieth4 wrote: infrequently shitting yourself is fine imo
There is a lot of very bizarre nonsense being talked on this forum. I shall now remain silent and logoff until my points are vindicated.
Player who complainted over being killed for looting cap office wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2023 1:33 am Hey there, I'm Virescent, the super evil person who made the stupid appeal and didn't think it through enough. Just came here to say: screech, retards. Screech and writhe like the worms you are. Your pathetic little cries will keep echoing around for a while before quietting down. There is one great outcome from this: I rised up the blood pressure of some of you shitheads and lowered your lifespan. I'm honestly tempted to do this more often just to see you screech and writhe more, but that wouldn't be cool of me. So come on haters, show me some more of your high blood pressure please.![]()
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
did you read a single post in this thread?
- Not-Dorsidarf
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:14 pm
- Byond Username: Dorsidwarf
- Location: We're all going on an, admin holiday
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
I got stuck on all the posts saying "we cant have depth because people dont get a chance to do anything meaningful before the shuttle is on its way"


kieth4 wrote: infrequently shitting yourself is fine imo
There is a lot of very bizarre nonsense being talked on this forum. I shall now remain silent and logoff until my points are vindicated.
Player who complainted over being killed for looting cap office wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2023 1:33 am Hey there, I'm Virescent, the super evil person who made the stupid appeal and didn't think it through enough. Just came here to say: screech, retards. Screech and writhe like the worms you are. Your pathetic little cries will keep echoing around for a while before quietting down. There is one great outcome from this: I rised up the blood pressure of some of you shitheads and lowered your lifespan. I'm honestly tempted to do this more often just to see you screech and writhe more, but that wouldn't be cool of me. So come on haters, show me some more of your high blood pressure please.![]()
- Qbopper
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2015 6:34 pm
- Byond Username: Qbopper
- Github Username: Qbopper
- Location: Canada
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
I think people feel the issue is "there's nothing that makes people want to do anything meaningful so the shuttle gets called", so your suggestion isn't a terrible one (even if I don't think it'll work as intended)Not-Dorsidarf wrote:I got stuck on all the posts saying "we cant have depth because people dont get a chance to do anything meaningful before the shuttle is on its way"
Limey wrote:its too late.
- Screemonster
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 7:23 pm
- Byond Username: Scree
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
There's nothing getting done
so people get bored
so people call the shuttle
so nobody bothers doing anything that takes any time as the shuttle will get called before they finish
so nothing gets done
so people get bored
etc
so people get bored
so people call the shuttle
so nobody bothers doing anything that takes any time as the shuttle will get called before they finish
so nothing gets done
so people get bored
etc
- Qbopper
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2015 6:34 pm
- Byond Username: Qbopper
- Github Username: Qbopper
- Location: Canada
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
also a valid interpretation, but what do I know about this gameScreemonster wrote:There's nothing getting done
so people get bored
so people call the shuttle
so nobody bothers doing anything that takes any time as the shuttle will get called before they finish
so nothing gets done
so people get bored
etc
Limey wrote:its too late.
- Luke Cox
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2014 8:52 am
- Byond Username: NocturnalQuill
- Location: Prisoner Transfer Room
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
If you'll forgive a little shilling, I made a proposal on how to add some depth to medical: https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=10107
Right now, mining is in a great place and engineering is moving towards a great place with a great new engine and remote power management. Cargo is showing some potential with the stock market computer and coderbus' flirting with a proper economic system. Science is fine apart from R&D, but that's an issue for another day. If we can make medical compelling, we'll fix half the problem. We've made substantial progress, and as I've said before, people are grossly overestimating the scope of the problem.
Right now, mining is in a great place and engineering is moving towards a great place with a great new engine and remote power management. Cargo is showing some potential with the stock market computer and coderbus' flirting with a proper economic system. Science is fine apart from R&D, but that's an issue for another day. If we can make medical compelling, we'll fix half the problem. We've made substantial progress, and as I've said before, people are grossly overestimating the scope of the problem.
- Haevacht
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 1:08 am
- Byond Username: Capital_H
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
I added a space ruin with a non-descript spear in space without a changelog.Qbopper wrote:if you're trying to say "we can't have secrets because open source" that's a strawman argument, there's more to having secrets than "put the item in a corner of maint"Shaps wrote:What is open source codebase
Jughu TC traded for it within an hour of it being live on the servers.
Kor's thing should help, you'd be able to add deep shit regarding it in regards to gear crafted from monster pieces, be it advanced healing chems using ones blood, or a fufilling monster jerky from the chef.
1% of a coder, 2% of a spriter, 97% >:3c
Random name on Bagel, usually assistant.
Random name on Bagel, usually assistant.
- Qbopper
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2015 6:34 pm
- Byond Username: Qbopper
- Github Username: Qbopper
- Location: Canada
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
I think that's more a criticism of TC trades than anything else tbh
Limey wrote:its too late.
- FantasticFwoosh
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 11:25 pm
- Byond Username: FantasticFwoosh
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
Admin interference i read that as Q-bopper in directly engineering a round rather than letting it happen because they won't actually build a solid event (= see admin complaints where admins have dropped traitor antags out of sympathy)
> Events are hard to construct granted but they were designated rounds for tomfoolery we were warned about, not admins are just randomly pressing buttons to entertain themselves.
> Events are hard to construct granted but they were designated rounds for tomfoolery we were warned about, not admins are just randomly pressing buttons to entertain themselves.
Spoiler:
- firecage
- Github User
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 4:22 pm
- Byond Username: Firecage
- Github Username: Firecage
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
Shadow, though the exact opposite might be an even bigger issue. Depth of an ocean, but width of a puddle. Aka very deep, complex, fluff, etc. features, but a very narrow amount of features. That would rapidly end up with things becoming boring.ShadowDimentio wrote:Width of an ocean, depth of a puddle. That's TG.
I agree with you, Oranges, but I don't think there's an answer anywhere to be found that will make people happy. Kor tried the whole "design lead" thing but nothing ever really came of it except him getting to dead stop PRs he didn't like.
Though, a middle ground which is width of a dam and depth of a dam would....ehhh, I don't know.
- MisterPerson
- Board Moderator
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:26 pm
- Byond Username: MisterPerson
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
Some stuff is going to remain shallow no matter what. We're never going to add much depth to the clown for example.
I code for the code project and moderate the code sections of the forums.
Feedback is dumb and it doesn't matter
Feedback is dumb and it doesn't matter
- ShadowDimentio
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 3:15 am
- Byond Username: David273
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
I DEMAND ADVANCED SLIPPING PHYSICS AND A CUSTOM ANIMATION FOR SLIPPING RIGHT NNNNNNOOOOOWWWWWWWWWW
Spoiler:
- Qbopper
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2015 6:34 pm
- Byond Username: Qbopper
- Github Username: Qbopper
- Location: Canada
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
clown needs a point reward systemMisterPerson wrote:Some stuff is going to remain shallow no matter what. We're never going to add much depth to the clown for example.
Limey wrote:its too late.
- bandit
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 7:35 pm
- Byond Username: Bgobandit
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
The way to add depth to medical is baymed, people just don't want to do it
- Qbopper
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2015 6:34 pm
- Byond Username: Qbopper
- Github Username: Qbopper
- Location: Canada
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
medical needs a point reward systembandit wrote:The way to add depth to medical is baymed, people just don't want to do it
non shitpost: I'm not really sure what we can do to create depth if the players don't want it and that's the impression a lot of people give me
Limey wrote:its too late.
- MisterPerson
- Board Moderator
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:26 pm
- Byond Username: MisterPerson
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
There's other way to do it. Look at being a medic in TF2 or Overwatch. Sure it's literally point n' heal, but there's depth from other systems.bandit wrote:The way to add depth to medical is baymed, people just don't want to do it
I code for the code project and moderate the code sections of the forums.
Feedback is dumb and it doesn't matter
Feedback is dumb and it doesn't matter
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
clearly this is not the right place to ask my question
- Wyzack
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 11:32 pm
- Byond Username: Wyzack
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
>make thread about moderating coder PR making
>thread immediatly and irreversibly turns into everyone arguing about what system is shallowest and what features would fix it
It was inevitable
>thread immediatly and irreversibly turns into everyone arguing about what system is shallowest and what features would fix it
It was inevitable
Arthur Thomson says, "Since there are no admins I would loging with another account and kill you"
Caleb Robinson laughs.
Arthur Thomson catches fire!
certified good poster
Caleb Robinson laughs.
Arthur Thomson catches fire!
tusterman11 wrote:Can you stop lying? I just asked you and you are was a piece of shiit on me!!!
EngamerAzari's real number one fangirl <3Kor wrote:I wish Wyzack was still an admin.
certified good poster
- MisterPerson
- Board Moderator
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:26 pm
- Byond Username: MisterPerson
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
The lack of direction is spilling over even here!Wyzack wrote:>make thread about moderating coder PR making
>thread immediatly and irreversibly turns into everyone arguing about what system is shallowest and what features would fix it
It was inevitable
I code for the code project and moderate the code sections of the forums.
Feedback is dumb and it doesn't matter
Feedback is dumb and it doesn't matter
- Saegrimr
- Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2014 4:39 pm
- Byond Username: Saegrimr
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
Are we really at the point where the biggest ideas for making people want to do their job is arbitrary good boy points on the screen?
Just add a fucking little glowing green +1 floating away from people's heads like the heal beam crosses whenever someone with (job tag) touches (job thing)
Just add a fucking little glowing green +1 floating away from people's heads like the heal beam crosses whenever someone with (job tag) touches (job thing)
tedward1337 wrote:Sae is like the racist grandad who everyone laughs at for being racist, but deep down we all know he's right.
-
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 10:26 pm
- Byond Username: KorPhaeron
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
This would be funnier if I didn't just basically open this PR as a joke and then had people take it seriously and support it.Saegrimr wrote:Are we really at the point where the biggest ideas for making people want to do their job is arbitrary good boy points on the screen?
Just add a fucking little glowing green +1 floating away from people's heads like the heal beam crosses whenever someone with (job tag) touches (job thing)
- Saegrimr
- Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2014 4:39 pm
- Byond Username: Saegrimr
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
tedward1337 wrote:Sae is like the racist grandad who everyone laughs at for being racist, but deep down we all know he's right.
- FantasticFwoosh
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 11:25 pm
- Byond Username: FantasticFwoosh
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
See example A. DEEPEST FEATURE ADDITIONS THE FUTURE OF MEDICAL IS HERE - INTERGALACTIC HEALTH VOUCHERS #25190
Spoiler:
- Qbopper
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2015 6:34 pm
- Byond Username: Qbopper
- Github Username: Qbopper
- Location: Canada
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
meme PR prank video [GONE TOO FAR]Kor wrote:This would be funnier if I didn't just basically open this PR as a joke and then had people take it seriously and support it.Saegrimr wrote:Are we really at the point where the biggest ideas for making people want to do their job is arbitrary good boy points on the screen?
Just add a fucking little glowing green +1 floating away from people's heads like the heal beam crosses whenever someone with (job tag) touches (job thing)
Limey wrote:its too late.
- starmute
- Joined: Mon Feb 29, 2016 4:48 pm
- Byond Username: Starmute
Re: Tragedy of the commons, tg's lack of depth
Here is my idea:
Coderbus should come up with a idea, and then work around the idea.
For example: Coderbus comes up with several ideas and one gets voted on.
Everyone contributes something to it and work around the concept for a week/month/ however long.
Coderbus celebrates after they are done by getting recognition on tgstation for a month.
Anyways that's Mute's stupid idea.
Coderbus should come up with a idea, and then work around the idea.
For example: Coderbus comes up with several ideas and one gets voted on.
Everyone contributes something to it and work around the concept for a week/month/ however long.
Coderbus celebrates after they are done by getting recognition on tgstation for a month.
Anyways that's Mute's stupid idea.
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users