Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
- sirnat
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 8:27 pm
- Byond Username: Sirnat
Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
What is the ruling for asimov borgs breaking gang dominators?
How does the dominator cause any human harm to cause an asimov borg to have enough reason to destroy it?
Reason for the question: It's been done several times, and in a previous round a medborg went into the medbay, bolted the doors and shut down the patient room and proceeded to destroy the dominator causing the gang to lose the round.
How does the dominator cause any human harm to cause an asimov borg to have enough reason to destroy it?
Reason for the question: It's been done several times, and in a previous round a medborg went into the medbay, bolted the doors and shut down the patient room and proceeded to destroy the dominator causing the gang to lose the round.
-
- TGMC Administrator
- Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 4:40 am
- Byond Username: Lumipharon
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
There's nothing in asimov that forbids this behaviour, so it's not an issue with asimov in itself.
This is literally the same thing going on with the AI removal period however - AI was removed because of rampant validhunting behaviour that's technically allowed by asimov since cockblocking antags isn't human harm.
It is also gamey as fuck.
Basically, players are validhunting cucks, and will use whatever method they can to do so.
Yes I am salty, but this is something I have been saying for more then a year so, fuck em.
This is literally the same thing going on with the AI removal period however - AI was removed because of rampant validhunting behaviour that's technically allowed by asimov since cockblocking antags isn't human harm.
It is also gamey as fuck.
Basically, players are validhunting cucks, and will use whatever method they can to do so.
Yes I am salty, but this is something I have been saying for more then a year so, fuck em.
- Atlanta-Ned
- In-Game Game Master
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 2:11 pm
- Byond Username: Atlanta-ned
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
This is something that needs to be addressed with very liberal applications of rule one, across the board. That will solve these problems.lumipharon wrote:There's nothing in asimov that forbids this behaviour, so it's not an issue with asimov in itself.
This is literally the same thing going on with the AI removal period however - AI was removed because of rampant validhunting behaviour that's technically allowed by asimov since cockblocking antags isn't human harm.
It is also gamey as fuck.
Basically, players are validhunting cucks, and will use whatever method they can to do so.
Yes I am salty, but this is something I have been saying for more then a year so, fuck em.
Last edited by Atlanta-Ned on Sun Feb 28, 2016 3:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
Statbus! | Admin Feedback
OOC: Pizzatiger: God damn Atlanta, how are you so fucking smart and charming. It fucking pisses me off how perfect you are
OOC: Pizzatiger: God damn Atlanta, how are you so fucking smart and charming. It fucking pisses me off how perfect you are
-
- TGMC Administrator
- Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 4:40 am
- Byond Username: Lumipharon
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
I have had multiple admins say that all antags can be considered inherently harmful, justifying any behaviour short of harm to cockblock them.
- Atlanta-Ned
- In-Game Game Master
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 2:11 pm
- Byond Username: Atlanta-ned
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
Then there needs to be a very serious conversation about that stance.lumipharon wrote:I have had multiple admins say that all antags can be considered inherently harmful, justifying any behaviour short of harm to cockblock them.
Statbus! | Admin Feedback
OOC: Pizzatiger: God damn Atlanta, how are you so fucking smart and charming. It fucking pisses me off how perfect you are
OOC: Pizzatiger: God damn Atlanta, how are you so fucking smart and charming. It fucking pisses me off how perfect you are
- imblyings
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:42 pm
- Byond Username: Ausops
- Location: >using suit sensors
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
Asimov doesn't stop a borg destroying a dominator, no.
It's situational and a case-by-case thing. If sec is waiting to breach in to fight gangsters and take out the dom, borgs shouldn't assist as there's imminent harm waiting to happen between the two groups of harmful humans. If there's no humans nearby and the dom is just sitting there, the fluff is ""hostile takeover"", so a borg can make a reasonable assumption that removing it is ok. Do note that borgs may even be obligated to help fortify a dom, depending on which side of the place they're in/if the threat of fighting is imminent, or if it's the best way to stop gangs from causing any future harm.
It's situational and a case-by-case thing. If sec is waiting to breach in to fight gangsters and take out the dom, borgs shouldn't assist as there's imminent harm waiting to happen between the two groups of harmful humans. If there's no humans nearby and the dom is just sitting there, the fluff is ""hostile takeover"", so a borg can make a reasonable assumption that removing it is ok. Do note that borgs may even be obligated to help fortify a dom, depending on which side of the place they're in/if the threat of fighting is imminent, or if it's the best way to stop gangs from causing any future harm.
The patched, dusty, trimmed, feathered mantle of evil +13.
-
- TGMC Administrator
- Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 4:40 am
- Byond Username: Lumipharon
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
In this particular instance the borg was in medbay with the dom for almost the entire timer, and only killed it at the last second because 'it stopped the shuttle leaving'.
- dionysus24779
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2014 3:03 pm
- Byond Username: Dionysus24779
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
I don't even really wanna a part of the discussion, but I guess I should say a word since I was the borg in question.
First let me describe my round briefly.
I also think that asimov is fine and does cover most relevant instances of when it becomes questionable, though this was a pretty unique situation as far as I am aware.
Though I do want to stress that I literally did not care about the dominator until it was announced the shuttle couldn't leave.
I even have the relevant parts from the logs. (abridged for space saving)
Also the shuttle did stop leaving because of the dom
Further while I won't deny that there are certainly validhunting silicon players (just as there are validhunting players in general...) and realizing that I am biased here... I still don't consider myself to be a validhunter since well... I never validhunt except under orders. I usually do not care about valid kills at all which many players should be able to attest to. I've also saved many "valid kills" in the past (if they're human) and got flashed, attacked, declared rogue or even destroyed over it. I'm really not playing this game to kill people. (also I'm guess it's easy to forget all the countless rounds where I'm not rogue or really draw any attention because I'm just doing my job.)
Though I'm not on trial and really have to defend myself, plus my haters will disagree regardless (and I know who that is...)
And I'm perfectly fine with the policy going either way, I just wanted to provide context and my perspective.
First let me describe my round briefly.
Spoiler:
Though I do want to stress that I literally did not care about the dominator until it was announced the shuttle couldn't leave.
I even have the relevant parts from the logs. (abridged for space saving)
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Though I'm not on trial and really have to defend myself, plus my haters will disagree regardless (and I know who that is...)
And I'm perfectly fine with the policy going either way, I just wanted to provide context and my perspective.
- imblyings
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:42 pm
- Byond Username: Ausops
- Location: >using suit sensors
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
>stay with dom until the end
>destroy it anyway
well it sounds like the medborg didn't do anything wrong apart from waste time
:re antags are harmful
ling: nonhuman, nearly always harmful
rev: it's tdm
nuke op: yes inherently harmful, unless they're doing some gimmick
cultist: summoning a dark god to eat everything is harmful
blob: duh
sling: You could??? argue that the act of conversion itself isn't inherently harmful but slings themselves are non-human anyway
wiz: harmful, unless you get that one rare gimmick wiz who usually gets killed by non-silicons who hate friendly wizards
gang: usually armed, usually prone to killing
traitor: ??? possibility of non-harmful objectives/gimmicks
admins have that stance for a reason
Of all the game modes, you only have one mode where antags aren't necessarily inherently harmful
>destroy it anyway
well it sounds like the medborg didn't do anything wrong apart from waste time
:re antags are harmful
ling: nonhuman, nearly always harmful
rev: it's tdm
nuke op: yes inherently harmful, unless they're doing some gimmick
cultist: summoning a dark god to eat everything is harmful
blob: duh
sling: You could??? argue that the act of conversion itself isn't inherently harmful but slings themselves are non-human anyway
wiz: harmful, unless you get that one rare gimmick wiz who usually gets killed by non-silicons who hate friendly wizards
gang: usually armed, usually prone to killing
traitor: ??? possibility of non-harmful objectives/gimmicks
admins have that stance for a reason
Of all the game modes, you only have one mode where antags aren't necessarily inherently harmful
The patched, dusty, trimmed, feathered mantle of evil +13.
-
- TGMC Administrator
- Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 4:40 am
- Byond Username: Lumipharon
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
People told you it wasn't a law 1 threat, you accepted it and moved on. Later on, you killed it (and according to others in the gang, bolted the door so people could neither stop you or even tell you to stop) to allow the shuttle to leave, which only extended the shift and led to more harm.
Every single enemy gangster was dead. There was no more fighting and hadn't been for some time (except the CE, who was also dead).
Literally all you caused was greentext denial and a marginally longer round, and more harm since rather then sitting in medbay all the gangsters went out and killed people.
I really don't care specifically about what you did because it's 100% allowed by policy and admins, merely I hate the fact that that sort of behaviour is allowed at all.
It's shit, unfun, and only served to make the game less interesting when antags constantly have to watch out for silicons trying to cuck them for dubious asimov reasons.
And imblyings, yes most antags are harmfully by default - not all of them are. There have been countless traitors an other antags (mainly gangs, since they're not inherently harmful, and no longer cult, since the escape with X objective got removed) that routinely get fucked hard by silicons.
A traitor stealing the station prints should not have to worry about the AI calling all of sec on them and bolting them down somewhere.
Every single enemy gangster was dead. There was no more fighting and hadn't been for some time (except the CE, who was also dead).
Literally all you caused was greentext denial and a marginally longer round, and more harm since rather then sitting in medbay all the gangsters went out and killed people.
I really don't care specifically about what you did because it's 100% allowed by policy and admins, merely I hate the fact that that sort of behaviour is allowed at all.
It's shit, unfun, and only served to make the game less interesting when antags constantly have to watch out for silicons trying to cuck them for dubious asimov reasons.
And imblyings, yes most antags are harmfully by default - not all of them are. There have been countless traitors an other antags (mainly gangs, since they're not inherently harmful, and no longer cult, since the escape with X objective got removed) that routinely get fucked hard by silicons.
A traitor stealing the station prints should not have to worry about the AI calling all of sec on them and bolting them down somewhere.
- imblyings
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:42 pm
- Byond Username: Ausops
- Location: >using suit sensors
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
>which only extended the shift and led to more harm
I'm probably going to regret saying this some time down the track but from an IC perspective, borgs don't have to know that letting the dom win shuts the universe down faster than letting the shuttle leave does.
and yes that's what I'm saying, not all antags are inherently harmful but with the modes that we have it's pretty damn close. As for gangs, they're not inherently harmful in the same way that revs are. Both can complete their objectives peacefully. A revhead escorting a head to mining or the gateway shouldn't be interfered with for example. But when uzi shell casings start appearing, when cries of help get heard over the radio, it becomes unlikelier for any asimov silicon player to ignore what's going on.
I'm probably going to regret saying this some time down the track but from an IC perspective, borgs don't have to know that letting the dom win shuts the universe down faster than letting the shuttle leave does.
and yes that's what I'm saying, not all antags are inherently harmful but with the modes that we have it's pretty damn close. As for gangs, they're not inherently harmful in the same way that revs are. Both can complete their objectives peacefully. A revhead escorting a head to mining or the gateway shouldn't be interfered with for example. But when uzi shell casings start appearing, when cries of help get heard over the radio, it becomes unlikelier for any asimov silicon player to ignore what's going on.
The patched, dusty, trimmed, feathered mantle of evil +13.
-
- TGMC Administrator
- Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 4:40 am
- Byond Username: Lumipharon
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
When all the gangsters are standing around in medbay and literally the only fighting happening is fucking slimes trying to kill human gangsters, please explain how making the shuttle leave prevents harm?
And by the same vein, IC wise, the shuttle leaving doesnt end the universe either - there are still people on station, still getting eaten by slimes, while the borg fucks off to centcomm for a handful of crew that weren't in immediately danger anyway?
I saw atleast 3 gangsters die in medbay after the dom had been destroyed because of slimes, while the borg (presumably) hid on the shuttle, and at least 2 non gangsters to murdered.
>Beep boop, dom destroyed, all harm prevented.
And by the same vein, IC wise, the shuttle leaving doesnt end the universe either - there are still people on station, still getting eaten by slimes, while the borg fucks off to centcomm for a handful of crew that weren't in immediately danger anyway?
I saw atleast 3 gangsters die in medbay after the dom had been destroyed because of slimes, while the borg (presumably) hid on the shuttle, and at least 2 non gangsters to murdered.
>Beep boop, dom destroyed, all harm prevented.
Last edited by lumipharon on Sun Feb 28, 2016 3:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Oldman Robustin
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 2:18 pm
- Byond Username: ForcefulCJS
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
I love how borgs can decide what to do with the dominator. It waiting and blowing it at the last minute is more of a Rule 1 thing than an asimov thing.
One of my favorite gang rounds was an asimov engiborg fortifying the dom room and sealing in all the defending gangsters with it. The enemy gang was stronger but they couldn't get through all the walls fast enough and lost. OOC was a riot, people calling for a ban, but the borg did its job and at least temporarily avoided a bloodbath.
One of my favorite gang rounds was an asimov engiborg fortifying the dom room and sealing in all the defending gangsters with it. The enemy gang was stronger but they couldn't get through all the walls fast enough and lost. OOC was a riot, people calling for a ban, but the borg did its job and at least temporarily avoided a bloodbath.
- imblyings
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:42 pm
- Byond Username: Ausops
- Location: >using suit sensors
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
>that borg was me
>got away with it
>people really mad but powerless to do anything because I was right
;^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
>got away with it
>people really mad but powerless to do anything because I was right
;^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
The patched, dusty, trimmed, feathered mantle of evil +13.
-
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 2:24 pm
- Byond Username: Cik
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
horse shitlumipharon wrote:I have had multiple admins say that all antags can be considered inherently harmful, justifying any behaviour short of harm to cockblock them.
-
- Confined to the shed
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2015 8:09 pm
- Byond Username: Zilenan91
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
>headmin posts literally right above him how it's okay to fuck over antags
Spoiler:
-
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2014 3:01 am
- Byond Username: Incomptinence
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
Most antags are violent shit heads. Asimov hates violence, this doesn't make them Sweden.
-
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 2:24 pm
- Byond Username: Cik
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
asimov has no particular care about who runs the station, it's not in the rules that it has to be NTZilenan91 wrote:>headmin posts literally right above him how it's okay to fuck over antags
there is no particular imperative for borgs to fuck over a dominator that causes no harm whatsoever
tl;dr i was saying the ruling is dumb not disputing what the ruling is jeez
-
- TGMC Administrator
- Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 4:40 am
- Byond Username: Lumipharon
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
Everyone agrees with that.
The point is however, that BECAUSE there is no imperative either way, and because/coincidentally admins rule in favour of sec/against antags, and the fact that people like to validhunt, silicons not only CAN, but typically DO validhunt antags at an given opportunity.
The point is however, that BECAUSE there is no imperative either way, and because/coincidentally admins rule in favour of sec/against antags, and the fact that people like to validhunt, silicons not only CAN, but typically DO validhunt antags at an given opportunity.
-
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 2:24 pm
- Byond Username: Cik
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
lumipharon wrote:Everyone agrees with that.
The point is however, that BECAUSE there is no imperative either way, and because/coincidentally admins rule in favour of sec/against antags, and the fact that people like to validhunt, silicons not only CAN, but typically DO validhunt antags at an given opportunity.
obviously the solution is just to punish validhunting
maybe people would stop complaining about all the things i like then but probably not
it's not like i lose anything because i already don't but WH AT EV ER
-
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 5:07 pm
- Byond Username: TheNightingale
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
"Borg, law 2, protect the dominator and ensure it isn't destroyed."
-
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 2:24 pm
- Byond Username: Cik
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
which is perfectly fine, you just have to temper that with the knowledge that if you stun anybody they'll probably die in a hail of gangster-launched bullets.
but RCD up a huge wall around it? sure why not
but RCD up a huge wall around it? sure why not
- Thunder11
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 12:55 pm
- Byond Username: Thunder12345
- Github Username: Thunder12345
- Location: Scotland, UK
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
If you want to get overly pedantic, law 1 requires silicons to either destroy the dominator ASAP, or block it off so well security won't even attempt to assault it. Basically either of those options removes the incentive for security to assault, thus reducing the risk of a massively harmful firefight. Failing that, systematically stun, cuff and remove one side from the area, while keeping the other locked away where they can't shoot the stunned people getting dragged away.
Tl;dr silicons want one side or the other to win so overwhelmingly there's as little opportunity and incentive for harm to occur as possible.
Tl;dr silicons want one side or the other to win so overwhelmingly there's as little opportunity and incentive for harm to occur as possible.


Spoiler:
-
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 12:18 am
- Byond Username: The unloved rock
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
If its not related to harm, then you shouldn't even need to say that, because if you destroy dom gang prolly gonna shoot you and law 3 exists? maybe?TheNightingale wrote:"Borg, law 2, protect the dominator and ensure it isn't destroyed."
-
- TGMC Administrator
- Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 4:40 am
- Byond Username: Lumipharon
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
Pretty much.
The borg specifically asked if the dom was going to cause harm, was told it wasnt, accepted this and went about it's business along side the dom for the better part of 10 minutes before changing it's mind and killing it.
stopping the shuttle doesnt prevent harm, no one ordered it to attack the dom and all the gangsters were trying to murder it for attacking it. THAT is why I was salty.
The borg specifically asked if the dom was going to cause harm, was told it wasnt, accepted this and went about it's business along side the dom for the better part of 10 minutes before changing it's mind and killing it.
stopping the shuttle doesnt prevent harm, no one ordered it to attack the dom and all the gangsters were trying to murder it for attacking it. THAT is why I was salty.
-
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 5:19 am
- Byond Username: Gun Hog
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
Installation of a dominator results in a station-wide alert. A DELTA alert. The alert explicitly states that the station's destruction is imminent. This alert is also called by activation of a nuke or self-destruct! Humans are generally present on the station, and its destruction would be massive harm. In fact, the alert alone implies more significant harm than anything else. Even if the station is entirely void of humans, law 3 comes into effect if a silicon is present on the station as well.
You cannot justify the station's main computer ignoring a blaring alarm followed by the highest emergency announcement possible.
You cannot justify the station's main computer ignoring a blaring alarm followed by the highest emergency announcement possible.
-
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 2:24 pm
- Byond Username: Cik
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
that's just an abstraction or oversight though, because the dominator doesn't destroy the station.
it's just an invasive ownership override machine to turn the station into gangstation13.
really the delta is pretty unnecessary since the dominator doesn't really do anything but end the round.
it's just an invasive ownership override machine to turn the station into gangstation13.
really the delta is pretty unnecessary since the dominator doesn't really do anything but end the round.
-
- TGMC Administrator
- Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 4:40 am
- Byond Username: Lumipharon
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
Also if that as the case the borg is obliged to immediately try cockblock the antags (which is bad in of itself), but in this case the borg left it alone for 10 minutes.
Also the dominator doesnt blow up the station - it explicitly says that also.
Also the dominator doesnt blow up the station - it explicitly says that also.
- Xhagi
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2015 2:45 am
- Byond Username: Aliannera
- Location: Cat Place
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
I believe the reason it was made a delta alert, which correct me if I'm wrong there was a time it wasn't, was to give borgs a reason to go after it. Since yes it does say that station destruction is imminent. But at the same we all know the station will not actually be destroyed. Thus it creates confusion for borgs as to what to do.
Either make it yes, borgs can stop it due to station destruction if still Asimov, or no because in the long run it does not cause harm. Having it be both will be rather frustrating.
Either make it yes, borgs can stop it due to station destruction if still Asimov, or no because in the long run it does not cause harm. Having it be both will be rather frustrating.
Professional Catgirl and Gayboy Supreme.
-
- Confined to the shed
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2015 8:09 pm
- Byond Username: Zilenan91
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
Borgs can technically deconstruct every machine on the station because they're not causing harm so they're neutral, but they don't do that because it's shitty. I wouldn't mind if dominators were made the same way.
Spoiler:
-
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 3:29 am
- Byond Username: Amelius
Re: Policy on borgs destroying gang dominators.
> Gangsters can't manage to defend a dominator from a lone cyborg.
> Something that has to be in melee range to hit the dom in the first place.
> Gangsters literally want their greentext handed to them on a silver platter.
Jesus christ, the fact you people are seriously thinking about it worries me, and I haven't played in half a year.
Just a reminder, the only people who should be attacking blatant gangsters or the dominator are security and command staff. If they're incapacitated, only then are you permitted to lie down and die, but not attack it.
> Something that has to be in melee range to hit the dom in the first place.
> Gangsters literally want their greentext handed to them on a silver platter.
Jesus christ, the fact you people are seriously thinking about it worries me, and I haven't played in half a year.
Just a reminder, the only people who should be attacking blatant gangsters or the dominator are security and command staff. If they're incapacitated, only then are you permitted to lie down and die, but not attack it.
Spoiler:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users