QoL for atmos goop
-
- Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2021 9:17 pm
- Byond Username: Likteer
QoL for atmos goop
A "design document"
More of "ideasguy-ing as an excuse to make this" than "making this as an excuse to ideasguy".
More of "ideasguy-ing as an excuse to make this" than "making this as an excuse to ideasguy".
-
- Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2021 9:17 pm
- Byond Username: Likteer
Re: QoL for atmos goop
fixed the link
and I just remembered the ideas forum exists
and I just remembered the ideas forum exists
- TheFinalPotato
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2019 7:58 am
- Byond Username: LemonInTheDark
- Pronouns: he/him is fine
Re: QoL for atmos goop
I kind of like how the foampack feels... significant? you know, like suiting up to go deal with something. I'd honestly prefer we make it more impactful, tho I'm not 100% sure on what your issues with it are so I have a hard time coming up with suggestions.
- Cobby
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:19 pm
- Byond Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobby
- Github Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobblestone
Re: QoL for atmos goop
its specifically designed to not be available at all times, and a good AT makes for a bad saboteur so I think there is some concerns about being able to easily isolate/fix a mess like that.
Voted best trap in /tg/ 2014-current
-
- Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2021 9:17 pm
- Byond Username: Likteer
Re: QoL for atmos goop
Thing is: it is fast & easy to just scrap the atmos suit and build a civilian MODsuit.
And that's probably the case with A LOT of things you can get an alternative module version of.
You could ofc rush to make THAT more tedious, but maybe stop & think if we really do have to make everything tedious.
And that's probably the case with A LOT of things you can get an alternative module version of.
You could ofc rush to make THAT more tedious, but maybe stop & think if we really do have to make everything tedious.
- TheFinalPotato
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2019 7:58 am
- Byond Username: LemonInTheDark
- Pronouns: he/him is fine
Re: QoL for atmos goop
I do not really follow what you're getting at
- Jacquerel
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 8:10 pm
- Byond Username: Becquerel
Re: QoL for atmos goop
I think what they are saying is that the atmos modsuit has what feels like significant slowdown on it, but that's attached to the suit and not the module so you can just put the module on a faster suit which feels odd for an atmospherics technician when they have a branded one they won't ever use for firefighting because of how slow it is
This is a preventative Forum User message to try and stop a perceived issue escalating before it ever really starts, and does not prevent the headmins from taking a different opinion and deleting my post. No formal action is being taken. No reply to this post is necessary. If you want to discuss the matter further, use forum PMs with me, but I have nothing else to say so I wouldn't waste the time.
- TheFinalPotato
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2019 7:58 am
- Byond Username: LemonInTheDark
- Pronouns: he/him is fine
Re: QoL for atmos goop
ah yeah that's weird
- NecromancerAnne
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2018 6:55 pm
- Byond Username: NecromancerAnne
- Location: Don't touch me, motherfucker...
- Pronouns: She/Her
Re: QoL for atmos goop
The atmos suit being a bit faster does sound like a good way to give it some relevance over the engineering suit, which is in every way a strictly better suit because it has shockproofing, and temp regulators can provide atmospheric protections if that's what you want.
- Turbonerd
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2022 3:18 pm
- Byond Username: AccountName5
Re: QoL for atmos goop
Maybe the module could be an innate property of the atmos modsuit and not be available on other modsuits.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users