Page 1 of 1
Policy Discussion Revivals
Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2024 1:59 pm
by Vekter
The relative success of Wallstation has shown us that some things that have historically been blocked here (ie non-human heads, Ligger being banned) can be quite popular. What's one thing you'd be willing to implement from the Policy Discussion forum that has usually been blocked by other head admin terms?
Re: Policy Discussion Revivals
Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2024 2:17 pm
by TheRex9001
It wasnt really blocked, but I liked the Bagil players table proposal. I think its cool to have a space like that and would help to improve our community. Im sad that it got closed, I dont know why it was but it doesnt seem to have been from a place of ”this sucks”. I expand more on why I love events in my platform but I think bagil playerstable would be a great avenue for map events and such.
Re: Policy Discussion Revivals
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2024 11:58 am
by WineAllWine
It kind of died a death but my day 1 policy change would be loosening the guidance on antag tokens
Re: Policy Discussion Revivals
Posted: Sun Aug 25, 2024 1:45 pm
by ekaterina
I like Justice's proposal in regards to a rule 2 precedent, which got blocked by the current term:
viewtopic.php?p=730595#p730595
It's weird to have the rules directly address one, and only one, specific way of preempting antagonists. Evidently, it has generated some uncertainty regarding what the spirit of the ruling is, which I see as an issue.
Re: Policy Discussion Revivals
Posted: Sun Aug 25, 2024 4:56 pm
by RaveRadbury
I want to canonize pun food names as valid felinid names.
I don't particularly care about felinids but I think the naming quirk is fun.
Re: Policy Discussion Revivals
Posted: Sun Aug 25, 2024 5:05 pm
by Lacran
RaveRadbury wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 4:56 pm
I want to canonize pun food names as valid felinid names.
I don't particularly care about felinids but I think the naming quirk is fun.
Unironically based.
I feel like lore-wise its impossible to treat felinids seriously anyway.