[COMPLAINT] [<Otter>] <Zaffinomlb>
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2023 5:03 am
BYOND account: <Zaffinomlb>
Admin in question: <Otter>
Your side of the story:
Generally speaking I would rather have a formal explanation and adjudication by all parties on the matter of my Deadmining.
The punishment for what was a rather benign "shitpost" in what has always been held to be a shitpost channel (the first pin of the channel is literally a headmin saying it's a shitpost channel) seems to be far in extreme and in excess.
The crime being posting a meme about Ted Kaczynski on the day of his death. You can view this for yourself in the "deleted" post logs.
Edit: I feel this needs to be put here so here it is I don't idolize Ted Kaczynski I simply have read ISAIF and Anti Tech Revolution and I agree with some of his ideas(key word there). I do not agree with the actions he took to draw attention to his ideas. Horrendous though they be the wheels of justice were turning for him and his victims. One can disavow someone's actions and still admire their works.
Someone pinged me about it in #past-round and I responded to them. Otter pinged me in adminbus, my post is deleted, where at the same the person I was talking to gave a reply, I read Otters post and then moved to DMs to comply with the directives. I discontinued and did not speak of Ted in TGMC.
Otter says, in DMs after Deadmining me "You have a history of doing similar things and getting yourself into controversy.", but I asked what examples of similar things, and none were provided.
The "controversy" if one can call it that is one case of a person who MIRED 3 other admins in their drama as well lest we forget and had a history of doing the same thing on /TG/. Said person also was actively stalking a member of our server too, so saying that was a case of me "getting myself into controversy" is dubious at best.
If anyone can please bring another example to light, I am all ears. If not I don't think it is a fair assertion. If it were true then I could understand this more, but its not so this seems to be a dubious statement and untoward at best.
His next line of reasoning was "I believe you would continue to if I gave you the chance."
Firstly, I am not banned from the server so this wouldn't have stopped any posting I might have done anyway.
I can fully understand if I continued having conversations, kept talking about it, and made multiple post in flagrant violation. In fact I could have seeing as a completely different person from the one I was talking to posted a literal Ted Kaczynski meme too, directly @ed me, but I didn't says anything to them or talk about it. That is me literally obeying the directive. A search can show this to be true, you can also check the delete logs, but you won't find anything cause its not there.
This all just seems to have been blown out of proportion and is rather too harsh of a response for what actually happened.
More over Otter also stated he "deadminned you(me) without clearance from the other two because they had not responded to the ping for 20 minutes"
They also say that they had both Zack and Nani's approval right after making that post.
So just to be clear, I complied, didnt continue posting, was @ed by another person other then the one I was talking to and didnt respond about the topic or at all. When asked what other history I have of this kind of "similar thing" was not given any example, and unilaterally removed after 20 minutes? This removal of adminship is a miscarriage of justice and unwarranted.
I have screen shot of conversations and evidence of other claims and matters, and can provide if desired.
Admin in question: <Otter>
Your side of the story:
Generally speaking I would rather have a formal explanation and adjudication by all parties on the matter of my Deadmining.
The punishment for what was a rather benign "shitpost" in what has always been held to be a shitpost channel (the first pin of the channel is literally a headmin saying it's a shitpost channel) seems to be far in extreme and in excess.
The crime being posting a meme about Ted Kaczynski on the day of his death. You can view this for yourself in the "deleted" post logs.
Edit: I feel this needs to be put here so here it is I don't idolize Ted Kaczynski I simply have read ISAIF and Anti Tech Revolution and I agree with some of his ideas(key word there). I do not agree with the actions he took to draw attention to his ideas. Horrendous though they be the wheels of justice were turning for him and his victims. One can disavow someone's actions and still admire their works.
Someone pinged me about it in #past-round and I responded to them. Otter pinged me in adminbus, my post is deleted, where at the same the person I was talking to gave a reply, I read Otters post and then moved to DMs to comply with the directives. I discontinued and did not speak of Ted in TGMC.
Otter says, in DMs after Deadmining me "You have a history of doing similar things and getting yourself into controversy.", but I asked what examples of similar things, and none were provided.
The "controversy" if one can call it that is one case of a person who MIRED 3 other admins in their drama as well lest we forget and had a history of doing the same thing on /TG/. Said person also was actively stalking a member of our server too, so saying that was a case of me "getting myself into controversy" is dubious at best.
If anyone can please bring another example to light, I am all ears. If not I don't think it is a fair assertion. If it were true then I could understand this more, but its not so this seems to be a dubious statement and untoward at best.
His next line of reasoning was "I believe you would continue to if I gave you the chance."
Firstly, I am not banned from the server so this wouldn't have stopped any posting I might have done anyway.
I can fully understand if I continued having conversations, kept talking about it, and made multiple post in flagrant violation. In fact I could have seeing as a completely different person from the one I was talking to posted a literal Ted Kaczynski meme too, directly @ed me, but I didn't says anything to them or talk about it. That is me literally obeying the directive. A search can show this to be true, you can also check the delete logs, but you won't find anything cause its not there.
This all just seems to have been blown out of proportion and is rather too harsh of a response for what actually happened.
More over Otter also stated he "deadminned you(me) without clearance from the other two because they had not responded to the ping for 20 minutes"
They also say that they had both Zack and Nani's approval right after making that post.
So just to be clear, I complied, didnt continue posting, was @ed by another person other then the one I was talking to and didnt respond about the topic or at all. When asked what other history I have of this kind of "similar thing" was not given any example, and unilaterally removed after 20 minutes? This removal of adminship is a miscarriage of justice and unwarranted.
I have screen shot of conversations and evidence of other claims and matters, and can provide if desired.