[DISCORD] <Royalderg>
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2022 2:35 pm
Discord username: <Royalderg#9964>
Banning admin: <Omega_DarkPotato#1232>
Ban reason: posted a bait-and-switch video that went into instructions on how to refine uranium and build a (very, very crude) nuclear bomb. Not only is this in violation of rules 7 and 13, but it's also very close to the federal offenses regarding dissemination of nuclear weapons or the information to build them. DO NOT DO THIS THANK YOU>
Time ban was placed: <7:20 AM, MST. 9/16/2022>
Your side of the story: <Posted a video that had obviously fake information on how to make a "nuclear bomb". In the reasoning the admin alludes to it being illegal and also "correct" information on how to make an explosive device. This is completely false. I would also like to point to US Federal law https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/832
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2339A
expert advice or assistance
(3) the term “expert advice or assistance” means advice or assistance derived from scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge.
and this term listed above. Now I will give you some advanced background I am not a nuclear bomb scientist, as much as I wish I was. Hence any information given is not illegal, especially when this information is completely inaccurate. As such, it also does not breach discord ToS as its not illegal, if you would like a copy of Discord's ToS here is one provided. https://discord.com/guidelines
Now if you wish to find a nuclear bomb scientist and inform me the information is correct, well then I will take the warning. >
Why you think you should be unbanned: <I don't think an official warning was justified, I think a slap on the wrist for a quick shot of adrenaline before realizing the guide was fake is fair. I can understand the position of a discord jannie and how seeing anything with the term "nuclear" is scary. Also because the intent wasn't to actually inform it was posted off the back of an in-depth guide on how to make fentanyl (which that one is actually accurate and that individual received no warning).>
Banning admin: <Omega_DarkPotato#1232>
Ban reason: posted a bait-and-switch video that went into instructions on how to refine uranium and build a (very, very crude) nuclear bomb. Not only is this in violation of rules 7 and 13, but it's also very close to the federal offenses regarding dissemination of nuclear weapons or the information to build them. DO NOT DO THIS THANK YOU>
Time ban was placed: <7:20 AM, MST. 9/16/2022>
Your side of the story: <Posted a video that had obviously fake information on how to make a "nuclear bomb". In the reasoning the admin alludes to it being illegal and also "correct" information on how to make an explosive device. This is completely false. I would also like to point to US Federal law https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/832
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2339A
expert advice or assistance
(3) the term “expert advice or assistance” means advice or assistance derived from scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge.
and this term listed above. Now I will give you some advanced background I am not a nuclear bomb scientist, as much as I wish I was. Hence any information given is not illegal, especially when this information is completely inaccurate. As such, it also does not breach discord ToS as its not illegal, if you would like a copy of Discord's ToS here is one provided. https://discord.com/guidelines
Now if you wish to find a nuclear bomb scientist and inform me the information is correct, well then I will take the warning. >
Why you think you should be unbanned: <I don't think an official warning was justified, I think a slap on the wrist for a quick shot of adrenaline before realizing the guide was fake is fair. I can understand the position of a discord jannie and how seeing anything with the term "nuclear" is scary. Also because the intent wasn't to actually inform it was posted off the back of an in-depth guide on how to make fentanyl (which that one is actually accurate and that individual received no warning).>