[DISCORD] Andrej99
Posted: Mon May 02, 2022 4:42 pm
Discord username: Andrej#1225
Banning admin: No idea, can't remember his name.
Ban reason: I disagreed with an admin politically, so he decided to ban me.
Time ban was placed: 2.5.2022. 18:20~
Your side of the story: The Yugoslav wars were brought up in order to attack my point. (I did not bring them up). My only claim in regards to genocide was that the Srebrenica massacre, although a horrible humanitarian catastrophe, was not a genocide, because it does not constitute genocide as defined by international law. The admin that banned me then proceeded to strawman my points, call me a Nazi and attack me personally, while continuing to make arguements in bad faith and non sequiturs. The other thing I denied was rape camps, when he posted an article talking about literal "tactical rape" (that's the words used to describe it in the article), based on investigations done by countries that committed an agression against Serbia, with no physical evidence to back up any of those claims. Only eyewitness accounts, which were faked. There is no politically neutral investigation of any of these events and no physical evidence to back up these claims.
You can read all of the conversation if you want, there is 3 hours of it yesterday and 3 hours today, and in all of that time I have been nothing but respectful, while everyone else was attacking me personally. I don't think I've said anything that could be constituted as a personal attack. If the admin that banned me, assuming that was him, implies that I denied his family died in genocide, that is also a lie. He said I did this, even though I literally expressed grief for his loss. I did though say before that, that he might be lying. Because he was being very subversive about our conversation beforehand.
Why you think you should be unbanned: The ban is entirely unjustified, there is absolutely no justification for it, unless you consider someone disagreeing politically with an admin something worthy of a ban. If you read the conversation, you will see that the admin in question was entirely taking the whole conversation in bad faith, putting words in my mouth and strawmaning everything I say.
Banning admin: No idea, can't remember his name.
Ban reason: I disagreed with an admin politically, so he decided to ban me.
Time ban was placed: 2.5.2022. 18:20~
Your side of the story: The Yugoslav wars were brought up in order to attack my point. (I did not bring them up). My only claim in regards to genocide was that the Srebrenica massacre, although a horrible humanitarian catastrophe, was not a genocide, because it does not constitute genocide as defined by international law. The admin that banned me then proceeded to strawman my points, call me a Nazi and attack me personally, while continuing to make arguements in bad faith and non sequiturs. The other thing I denied was rape camps, when he posted an article talking about literal "tactical rape" (that's the words used to describe it in the article), based on investigations done by countries that committed an agression against Serbia, with no physical evidence to back up any of those claims. Only eyewitness accounts, which were faked. There is no politically neutral investigation of any of these events and no physical evidence to back up these claims.
You can read all of the conversation if you want, there is 3 hours of it yesterday and 3 hours today, and in all of that time I have been nothing but respectful, while everyone else was attacking me personally. I don't think I've said anything that could be constituted as a personal attack. If the admin that banned me, assuming that was him, implies that I denied his family died in genocide, that is also a lie. He said I did this, even though I literally expressed grief for his loss. I did though say before that, that he might be lying. Because he was being very subversive about our conversation beforehand.
Why you think you should be unbanned: The ban is entirely unjustified, there is absolutely no justification for it, unless you consider someone disagreeing politically with an admin something worthy of a ban. If you read the conversation, you will see that the admin in question was entirely taking the whole conversation in bad faith, putting words in my mouth and strawmaning everything I say.