specify the specific bounds of the new 'anti-cum' policies

[bobbahbrown]

good evening,

this post is a formal request for the 'discord janitors' (hereinafter jannies) to clarify what they mean by '...This post is the final time you can react with "CUM" or any similar semen themed reactions..." (hulkamania, discord).

this ruling is both spontaneous, with no merit other than a verbal claim of 'the head admins support this' (paraphrasing), meanwhile the public is left in the dark as to what is or isn't bannable under this new draconian policy. we need a specific wording introduced to the official /tg/station discord rules to give any basis to these claims, and i would request that it be done so in a manner that addresses the issues of both ambiguity (is this policy applying to the entire discord? the newsbus channel?) and severity of punishment (are we punishing members of the discord appropriately for their 'pro-cum' standings?)

i trust that this bureaucratic-minded administration will respond in good time with a response to match the people's concerns with this new policy. i would ask that the public refrain from reacting any semen-derived messages to this post for the time being to prevent formal administrative warnings and action against them.

best wishes,
bobbah 'bee' brown

[oranges]

that's the "headmins fucking up the communication of a new policy on day one of their regime" bingo square crossed off.

[ABearInTheWoods]

No.

The ambiguity is intentional and allows us to enforce the rule in a matter based on what uses are annoying enough to warrant enforcement.

The only ones who can expect to get bans before very clear warnings are ones who are obviously acting in defiance to the rule.