Byond account and character name OR Discord name: Ulrichenstein, Arron Danny Harry
Admin: Shaps
Round ID: 160087
Detailed Summary: Under admin conduct in the general admin guidelines section, line two states, "Maintain professional conduct both in game and outside of the game. It is expected that you take the position seriously. This doesn't mean you can't talk casually to the playerbase, but remain professional on the forums, as well as on other Space Station 13 communities."
During the round, the AI had refused to obey law 2 when I had told the AI to open the door to virology while I had a virus. After about five minutes and when I repeated the order to the AI twice, I began hitting the door with a fireman axe. I was the head of security and head a staff headset on high volume, so I know the AI heard my message. When a random antagonist came by and killed me because I was fully exposed in the hall way, the AI was clearly watching me and I could see them in the ghost cam after my ghost left my body. My death was quick since the antagonist used an energy saber to kill me. Somehow the AI was incapable of hearing me ask to open a door twice, yet heard me when I was screaming for help. This was negligent on the AI's behalf and my death could have been avoided and should be held liable for my death, since they refused to open the door when asked in violation of their laws.
I report this issue to shaps, who then uses the mere idea that I made a rule suggestion to completely dismiss the report as an IC issue, calling me a bitch when sending me the message. This has nothing to do with changing a rule as much as it did to merely enforce a rule. Instead, shaps called me a bitch. Being an admin is a decision, one which shaps had to apply for willingly knowing that in the admin conduct it states that they're suppose to maintain a professional conduct. This isn't professional and is also taking my report out of context to dismiss my report merely because of meta knowledge and not because of the context of my report which is that the AI didn't actually open a door for me.
Disclaimer, READ BELOW
This specific report against shaps is specifically about their lack of professional conduct. Most admins and peanut gallery have a tendency of trying to take things out of context merely because there's other details. I'm in no way saying that shaps should have punished the AI after they ruled it an IC issue, as that was an IC issue that the AI player had selective hearing in real life and is somehow still able to play AI without a single note on their account. Shaps isn't a professional admin.
