Page 1 of 1
Radical chemistry idea that isn't a shitpost
Posted: Sat May 05, 2018 8:23 pm
by kevinz000
I was going to PR it but I think I'll make a forum thread first
What if all the different gases were all reagents, not just plasma/n2o/oxygen
and plasma and oxygen could combust in beakers
and tritium could exist in beakers
and all the other reactions could happen in beakers..?
Re: Radical chemistry idea that isn't a shitpost
Posted: Sat May 05, 2018 8:25 pm
by somerandomguy
kevinz000 wrote:I was going to PR it but I think I'll make a forum thread first
What if all the different gases were all reagents, not just plasma/n2o/oxygen
and plasma and oxygen could combust in beakers
and tritium could exist in beakers
and all the other reactions could happen in beakers..?
Sure if it means you can flood the station with gaseous synthflesh/beepsky smash/lube
Re: Radical chemistry idea that isn't a shitpost
Posted: Sat May 05, 2018 8:26 pm
by somerandomguy
There would probably have to be a machine that condenses the gas into beakers though (and vice versa)
Re: Radical chemistry idea that isn't a shitpost
Posted: Sat May 05, 2018 8:29 pm
by kevinz000
chem gases likely won't exist except for the actual... gases that are also chems, due to how well the last two chem gas projects went (not very well!)
Re: Radical chemistry idea that isn't a shitpost
Posted: Sat May 05, 2018 8:33 pm
by Dr_bee
Doesnt this kind of take away the unique fun atmos and toxins have? Chemistry has its own stuff, dont give them toxin's as well.
Re: Radical chemistry idea that isn't a shitpost
Posted: Sat May 05, 2018 8:38 pm
by Anonmare
When will chem reagents start to respect the states of matter?
Re: Radical chemistry idea that isn't a shitpost
Posted: Sat May 05, 2018 10:39 pm
by Selea
If we can't allow all reagents to have gaseous form(according to duncathan), we can make corresponding reagents for all gasses. It would be interesting.
Also IMO good idea to allow some reactions only in gaseous form. To make chem a bit more complicated and deep.