Page 2 of 3
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 6:18 am
by PKPenguin321
Bottom post of the previous page:
Based on a positive attitude and low standards for what is fun
If it sucks that'll be a shame but it's kinda hard to fuck up a deathmatch FPS
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Tue May 10, 2016 6:19 pm
by Lumbermancer
>All the light machine guns were very different. We can create unique gameplay flavours with light machine guns and heavy machine guns, that people probably didn't carry but we will allow them to carry them anyway because it's really cool.
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we Sky Captain and Crimson Skies now
Posted: Tue May 10, 2016 6:27 pm
by IrishWristWatch0
An0n3 wrote:The amount of historical fuck ups going on in that one image is historical in and of itself.
You mean capes WEREN'T popular in 1916?
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Tue May 10, 2016 8:37 pm
by IrishWristWatch0
unplayable
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Tue May 10, 2016 10:02 pm
by tedward1337
Inb4 there's DLC that lets you play as a young Hitler in WW1
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Tue May 10, 2016 10:06 pm
by XSI
That would actually both make the game popular with some people, and would be an outrage-causing event that would give them loads of free publicity.
It could happen
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Tue May 10, 2016 11:51 pm
by ThanatosRa
tedward1337 wrote:Inb4 there's DLC that lets you play as a young Hitler in WW1
Is that before or after all the players already trying to play him?
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Wed May 11, 2016 12:38 am
by DrPillzRedux
A DLC about how Hitler was a good boy who dindu nuffin until WW1 transformed his mind?
I mean hey it sounds cool.
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Wed May 11, 2016 2:33 am
by DrPillzRedux
Even Ian is commenting, oh my god.
[youtube]dDRRlVElEXI[/youtube]
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 3:57 pm
by Comrade Leo
Can't wait for the "No British" section of the game, where myself a british spy disguised as a jerry in a hun flamethrower unit, walks through Ypres and wipe out my Great Uncle's light infantry battalion, in the most horrific manner imaginable.
Or the "Help I can't see I'm literally choking on my own blood because of this gas" mission.
Or the QTE to shoot myself in the foot so I can go back home.
Or the Conscientious objector mission were I must maintain my dignity as I'm tied to a post and shot for cowardice, be forgotten by the country for 9 decades until some newspaper and blond haired comedy actress starts a campaign to get the british government to admit it was wrong.
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we Sky Captain and Crimson Skies now
Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 4:10 pm
by Timbrewolf
CosmicScientist wrote:IrishWristWatch0 wrote:An0n3 wrote:The amount of historical fuck ups going on in that one image is historical in and of itself.
You mean capes WEREN'T popular in 1916?
Nah it's that his commanding officer isn't pictured sending them to a firing squad for wearing a coat in such an unsightly and undignified manner.
In a starvation-induced haze private Dazzler climbed the trench and leveled his pistol at the opposing lines. For a moment the wind caught the cape he'd been using to stifle his hunger shakes and it billowed majestically behind him.
Then a few hundred bullets ripped across no-man's land and shredded his body into such scraps the men were only able to collect a few of his teeth and knucklebones to send home in a small parcel to be buried.
The End.
One of my major gripes is that, if this is really WW1, the guy on the cover is committing suicide by firing line, yet it's pitched as being really dramatic and heroic. It's so stupid it makes me laugh and reminds me of the Call of Duty 3 cover art where the guy is obviously turned around and firing into his own troops while the guy behind him is like "Dude what the fuck are you doing?!"

Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 4:34 pm
by Skorvold
Do we get to sink the Lusitania if we play as Germans?
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 8:00 pm
by IrishWristWatch0
Skorvold wrote:Do we get to sink the Lusitania if we play as Germans?
or assassinate Arch Duke Ferdinand? POWDER KEG PEOPLE POWDER KEG
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 6:46 am
by onleavedontatme
Beta is out. It's okay.
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 7:00 am
by DrPillzRedux
I'm enjoying it, even though there are glitches and balance issues. Truly our new PTSD simulator.
[youtube]4hfuA65JVyA[/youtube]
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 7:05 am
by onleavedontatme
I wish they'd chosen a different map. Gianty empty ones are a fucking awful if you're not in a tank.
Probably a weird complaint considering they're one of the primary selling points of battlefield, but I really hate vehicle combat outside of dense city maps.
Game looks and runs great though.
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 8:21 am
by DrPillzRedux
>runs great
Yeah I'm getting over 100 fps in high with a 970, but it has a huge memory leak. I mean fucking HUGE.
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 11:10 am
by IrishWristWatch0
DrPillzRedux wrote:>runs great
Yeah I'm getting over 100 fps in high with a 970, but it has a huge memory leak. I mean fucking HUGE.
Havent seen a leak yet on my 970. I am getting a ton of rubberbanding and running in place.
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 4:04 pm
by onleavedontatme
IrishWristWatch0 wrote:DrPillzRedux wrote:>runs great
Yeah I'm getting over 100 fps in high with a 970, but it has a huge memory leak. I mean fucking HUGE.
Havent seen a leak yet on my 970. I am getting a ton of rubberbanding and running in place.
Odd, this is the smoothest battlefield in years for me network wise. Maybe because I was playing at midnight when few people were on.
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 4:45 am
by DrPillzRedux
The best part about this game is sneaking around getting stealth kills. If I get caught I just run into a building and wait with my shotty up.
[youtube]KmTDRsMToK4[/youtube]
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 5:28 am
by onleavedontatme
These bolt action sniper wars sorta remind of Day of Defeat.
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 5:41 am
by TechnoAlchemist
Played a healthy amount with some buds - the sniper rifles seem very good, and I think that the good scopes and lack of serious range fall off makes them almost detract from the games feel. I mean it may be just because the one large map we have is very open and favors snipers, but I'd much prefer the game if it focused on mid-close range combat vs the sniper being the end all weapon anywhere except close combat.
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 8:08 pm
by XSI
If you want an authentic WW1 experience
You're out of luck. Not really available I think.
I mean Verdun exists but they fucked that one up
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2016 2:10 am
by Timbrewolf
[youtube]vlZ53hLUg6o[/youtube]
Yeah no.
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2016 2:12 am
by Wyzack
> everyone has automatics
> all those bullets and can't kill anyone
Top game
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2016 2:39 am
by PKPenguin321
An0n3 wrote:[youtube]vlZ53hLUg6o[/youtube]
assistant_saxxes_nukeops_machineguns.mp4
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2016 3:19 am
by DrPillzRedux
SMG's and LMG's (unless the bipod is deployed) are hard-coded to suck beyond close range for SMG's and medium range for LMG's. It's to stop people from burst firing SMG's like AR's.
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2016 3:24 am
by onleavedontatme
In half those clips his sight isn't even over the guy he's missing anyway.
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2016 3:41 am
by DrPillzRedux
I mean literally your iron sights don't matter past the coded ranger after the first shot.
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2016 4:19 am
by paprika
Ok germans and british having 1 single white guy as one of the classes is pretty hilarious, even if it's tied into the 'alternate history' campaign it's probably the most hilarious thing about this game, you can put people in stupid arenas and have prototype tanks everywhere but I guess I'm a turbo racist if I find it funny I load into the brits and they have 2 black dudes while the turks are all actually turks.
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2016 5:24 am
by DrPillzRedux
Yeah the pandering is full blast. There's that, the main menu, all the ads, and I think the guy on the warbond is black too.
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2016 5:36 am
by TheColdTurtle
Wow how racist of you, didn't you know that before the holocaust that 90 percent of Europe was brown? Jeez pillz, revisionist much?
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 2:56 am
by DrPillzRedux
I can't stop making these.
That one guy who jumps when he see's the flamethrower and has an "oh fuck" moment where he pauses before he starts firing, then runs away on fire screaming gets me.
[youtube]cgAOsWyUwtE[/youtube]
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:01 am
by tedward1337
The horse lit on fire and ran
Top shelf
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:27 am
by IrishWristWatch0
Everyone add me on origin, RKeleyGoldenRain
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:25 pm
by InsaneHyena
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2016 8:47 am
by DrPillzRedux
Anti-tank loadout on attack planes give them a tank cannon.
It does 25 damage to a tank.
Meanwhile, you can 1 shot the small planes, 1/2 shot other attack planes, and 2 shot bombers. It's extremely easy to use.
Also, the Tank Hunter loadout on the landship that gives you the big anti-tank rifle? It only does 20 damage to tanks max. Against infantry it's a one-shot kill and is extremely easy to snipe with.
Go Dice.
Also spiked club sounds nasty.
[youtube]V2cDad3naAs[/youtube]
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 12:25 am
by onleavedontatme
>watch DrPillz "ptsd" video
>now getting ads for veteran suicide hotlines
EDIT: Speaking of recording, I wish I was doing it sometimes. Just shotgunned a plane with a heavy tank, disabled the engine and had it land right on top of me (without it dying somehow), only to send it flying over several buildings with another point blank shotgun blast to finish it off.
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 12:27 am
by onleavedontatme
Also yeah, melee is great in this game. Two squads entering a building at the same time and it devolving into a swirling melee is good fun.
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 11:01 am
by J_Madison
I am now terrified when I'm pushing the desert and I've got scouts plinking at me, heavy tank crawling near my side, and explosions all around.
Also automatico trench is the most hilarious fun ever. Uncontrollable recoil.
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2016 6:55 am
by DrPillzRedux
The singleplayer is looking really good. It's focusing on PTSD/War is Hell, and the humanity of soldiers. Literally every cutscene shown so far has all of those.
[youtube]zjc1Txc4r4w[/youtube]
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:50 am
by DrPillzRedux
So been playing a bit.
Assault is fine. All support LMG's suck unless they have a bipod and scope. Except maybe the BAR with the grip. It feels like an AR but empties fast. Medic is the current meta as semiauto's are strong as fuck. Scout is, well... scout.
Can't stand any of the desert maps. However, all the Europe ones are good. Especially the forest and city one. They both look and feel great, having really intense battles.
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 4:36 am
by onleavedontatme
DICE continues to have the best sound in videogames.
Was worried the WW1 setting would feel gimmicky but this is the best battlefield in a long time.
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 6:10 am
by oranges
Some of the maps are a little onesided if you know which objective points to cap first.
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 6:12 am
by DrPillzRedux
Here's the issues with it though, and they make the game worse all around.
All of the guns (exclusing snipers) have shitty damage and mag sizes. This means that on all weapons except the Hellriegal and sniper rifles, you'll get 2, SOMETIMES 3 kills before you must reload. In that time you will be killed. It's boring running in, killing 2 people, then dying and doing it all over again.
The spawn system is the worst it's ever been. You can choose to spawn on squad and get assfucked by a tank/flanking enemy, or on a point and run a mile to get to the frontline, where you'll die in 20 seconds.
The "sweet spot" mechanic for snipers is garbage. It's so big that most of the time you'll be getting killed in one shot by the 20 or so snipers on the other team.
They nerfed support so hard since the beta it's practically useless except for being an ammo dispenser. If an LMG doesn't have a bipod or it's not the Bar Storm or Telescopic, it's garbage.
Tanks are more fucking annoying than ever.
This video just sums it all up.
[youtube]W1YDaSw8gDM[/youtube]
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 10:41 am
by oranges
DrPillzRedux wrote:All of the guns (exclusing snipers) have shitty damage and mag sizes. This means that on all weapons except the Hellriegal and sniper rifles, you'll get 2, SOMETIMES 3 kills before you must reload. In that time you will be killed. It's boring running in, killing 2 people, then dying and doing it all over again.
Have you considered you might be doing it wrong by running into a large group of people and trying to kill them all with just one mag
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 12:00 pm
by Lumbermancer
DrPillzRedux wrote:This means that on all weapons except the Hellriegal and sniper rifles, you'll get 2, SOMETIMES 3 kills before you must reload. In that time you will be killed. It's boring running in, killing 2 people, then dying and doing it all over again.]
wow only 3 kills on one mag just get fucking good lmao
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 6:23 pm
by XSI
>WW1
>Your prefered tactic is running in and killing 2-3 dudes before dying
If this actually works then they fucked up the WW1 thing, but then it is Battlefield so I'm pretty sure nobody expected them to do WW1 with any semblance of historical accuracy whatsoever
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 6:33 pm
by tedward1337
If there were actual objectives people followed like with what verdun has then yes, this game could resemble somewhat of a WWI atmosphere.
What we have here is BF4: WW1 edition.
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 8:02 pm
by onleavedontatme
Battlefield has literally never been realistic, not sure why people keep pointing out something we've known for 15 years now.
Re: Field of Battle 5 - we "World War 1" now.
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 9:14 pm
by DrPillzRedux
itt: people who haven't played for more than a few hours talk like they know how normies play in it
You can take it slow and you'll still get raped in the side by sniper mcfuckface the 30th.