/tg/Station 13

Bottom post of the previous page:

NikNakFlak wrote:Or, alternatively and arguably the better solution is for people to chill out and argue their point without being hostile and insulting about it.

Reasonable discussion is for singulo, not here.

@peoplearestrange

what i meant is that the people should be the ones that decide whether feedback is shit or not, especially if we get public logging like Aurx suggested, instead of admins

if its an OBVIOUS shitpost, like:

tommy posted: lol

then sure, remove it. but a collective of "shitposts" might just mean said admin is doing something wrong (unless, of course, its just a bunch of alt accounts) but a collective of positive one liner posts might mean said admin is doing well, and its up to the admin to ask these individuals what they mean

for example:

player: your cool
admin: why?
player: well, you helped me out one time in adminPM when i was just a scrub tier newbie
admin: oh, ok

or

player: you are shit
admin: why?
player: you once did this really bad event
admin: how was it bad?
player: it killed me at round start ;(
admin: ok, ill stop



not every is going to write up a huge fucking format for every bad or good experience they have with an administrator to make it prim and proper so it doesn't get deleted (aka admin complaints board)





but that was old /tg/, aka a perfect world ;(

Why did Brotemis's posts get deleted? They weren't any more hostile than his usual, which is about equal with HG's and mine.

Were actual users complaining about the admin feedback and steno boards, or just admins? And when you guys say "We decided in adminbus" what does that really mean? Who brought up the idea?

Both posts had straight up namecalling in them, totally unveiled insults.

I believe it was HBL who floated the idea. I consulted the other forum admins, and MSO said it was up to HBL since game admins control FNR.

I don't even care anymore. If I was an admin I wouldn't want to be accountable for my terrible interactions with players either. When players act like shit in admin PMs and act aggressive they get banned based on that alone. When admins do it nothing happens even though they're the ones that are supposed to remain neutral and level headed and the pissed off player who either just got griefed or is being accused of something he might have not done is not allowed to be a little pissed.

Enjoy your hot pockets.

just waiting for someone to comment with "everyone who is defending this are shit players!!!!" and the thread to be locked by a forum mod under the pretense of shitposting with no actual admin ruling

Eh, what's done is done, I've said my piece, no point in going in circles I guess. Although I'd love to know what Bro's response was to my post, they're usually amusing at least, plus sometimes he makes good points between the frothing insane rants.

Speaking of frothing insane rants, what ever happened to SAC?

paprika wrote:I don't even care anymore. If I was an admin I wouldn't want to be accountable for my terrible interactions with players either. When players act like shit in admin PMs and act aggressive they get banned based on that alone. When admins do it nothing happens even though they're the ones that are supposed to remain neutral and level headed and the pissed off player who either just got griefed or is being accused of something he might have not done is not allowed to be a little pissed.

Enjoy your hot pockets.

We *are* accountable. It's called admin complaints.

That's a funny joke. Thread locked

My point of view is that most 'feedback' is non - specific comments that basically boil down to 'He ban me. He suck.' Or 'he event me. He good.'

The feedback forums were a joke from beginning even if well intentioned. Its admirable but futile in the end if feedback devolves into nonspecific compliments on one end and name calling on the other.

Basically is there a better option than a 'admin feedback' forum? Or are people going to be willing to post actual feedback. None of this 'pile of shitposts amount to something.' A pile of shit is still, at its very base, shit.

A pile of shit is shit, sure, but a pile of shit with some gold nuggets in it can be harvested, and then you have gold! Shiny shiny gold!

Sort of like the playerbase itself. Sure, there's a mountain of shit there, but there are a lot of good players. You don't throw away the game because there are a lot of shitty players in it.

damiac wrote:You don't throw away the game because there are a lot of shitty players in it.

We don't even throw out the players a lot of the time. ツ

Hornygranny wrote:Stickymayhem had generally positive feedback, but is one of the only people to have gotten in trouble for misconduct in quite a while.

I left him negative feedback calling him unprofessional and unable to resolve conflicts, it was promptly deleted as a "thinly veiled ban appeal" by Pandarsenic/peoplearestrange(forgot which).

Even though it made absolutely no mention of any ban and it was Stickymayhem himself to make it about one. Week later he gets banned for just that kind of unprofessional behavior.

Similarly to how admin complaints get instantly locked and argued "you must ban appeal your 15 min ban first even when it's over already", admin feedback was a place of positive encouragement with an iron smile. :^)

http://tgstation13.org/phpBB/memberlist ... group&g=10

>Users of this group will be unable to see the admin feedback forum.

This is honestly getting ridiculous now.

HOLY SHIT LOL I'M LAUGHING SO HARD.

Okay let me put this into perspective Hg and elynia you're the type of niggas okay okay listen up you're the type of niggas who like put their hands in their ears and scream "I'M NOT GOING tO LISTEN YADADADADADADADDA" and then continue to do whatever the fuck wrong they were doing. You're babies basically. You can't handle feedback, and you disguise it to the fact that it's all shitposting. No, you're delusional, it's not all shitposting; it's just easier for you to deal with everyone hating you by pretending it's shitposting.

I never thought I would say this but holy shit singulo is literally a haven for discussion without any forum mod putting their subjective will on what people see.


i guess i gotta puush this post as well before any fuckface thinks it'll be a great idea to delete it 4 no raisin.

Brotemis wrote:My point of view is that most 'feedback' is non - specific comments that basically boil down to 'He ban me. He suck.' Or 'he event me. He good.'

The feedback forums were a joke from beginning even if well intentioned. Its admirable but futile in the end if feedback devolves into nonspecific compliments on one end and name calling on the other.

Basically is there a better option than a 'admin feedback' forum? Or are people going to be willing to post actual feedback. None of this 'pile of shitposts amount to something.' A pile of shit is still, at its very base, shit.

This is sort of ironic because (to actually answer HBL's question) I was going to point out Brotemis' thread, at least for a little while, as an example of players giving detailed/constructive criticism and the admin actually responding to it in turn.

I can't stop laughing

PSA: elynia is a dude

ColonicAcid wrote:HOLY SHIT LOL I'M LAUGHING SO HARD.

Okay let me put this into perspective Hg and elynia you're the type of niggas okay okay listen up you're the type of niggas who like put their hands in their ears and scream "I'M NOT GOING tO LISTEN YADADADADADADADDA" and then continue to do whatever the fuck wrong they were doing. You're babies basically. You can't handle feedback, and you disguise it to the fact that it's all shitposting. No, you're delusional, it's not all shitposting; it's just easier for you to deal with everyone hating you by pretending it's shitposting.

I never thought I would say this but holy shit singulo is literally a haven for discussion without any forum mod putting their subjective will on what people see.


i guess i gotta puush this post as well before any fuckface thinks it'll be a great idea to delete it 4 no raisin.

I think I made it abundantly clear that I did not care what feedback was left for me when the board is open. Not seeing the board at all is a convenience; people who think it isn't waste of time can moderate it instead of me.

Yes, deleting it then bringing it back but making a group for people who want to ignore it is farcical as hell.

Like I said, admins who don't want to view feedback don't have to, they aren't the types of admins who would benefit from it in the first place. We DO have admins who like feedback though.

Additionally, your thread should remain open. Even if you don't read it, people might have stuff they will want to get off their chest without PMing you directly.

ColonicAcid wrote:i guess i gotta puush this post as well before any fuckface thinks it'll be a great idea to delete it 4 no raisin.

ive been doing that with every post of mine in this thread