/tg/Station 13

Bottom post of the previous page:

CosmicScientist wrote:

DemonFiren wrote:Man, it sure feels good to live in a country where the only commonly available weapon is the tactical assault truck.

Are swastikas and nazi flags not weapons?
this sounded funny in my head

Wasn't it Sin City that had the throwing-star swastikas?

Grazyn wrote:a handy guide on the upcoming Italian elections

I need clarification. Does "likes Europe" mean they like the continent, the contents of the continent, or Brussels?

nobody likes brussels
the eu, on the other hand

The EU. Also the granddaughter of Mussolini is currently in the EU parliament, but she is also running for re-election for Berlusconi's party and will vacate her EU seat when elected and will come back to bring her colourful personality in the national parliament.

I thought they locked up Berlusconi for tax fraud and mafia connections?

He was only sentenced for tax fraud and served his time doing community service in a retirement home (basically playing cards and telling jokes), but the leftist government managed to pass a law that prevents anyone sentenced for a crime from running for office. He appealed that to the EU civil rights court and he's currently waiting for the response (expected at the end of March), but this didn't stop him from using his name to bootstrap his party and basically run the whole campaign by himself. You ask anyone (mostly elders) and they will tell you they're voting "for Berlusconi" even though he can't actually be elected.

I'm voting Berlusconi and I'm not even Italian

He tried (and succeeded) at painting himself as the wise grandfather of the nation, exploiting the rise of Lega and the neofascists to showcase his party as the warm, comfortable center-right middle ground that will protect the country from extremists.

From what I remember Berlusconi is Trump except with style because he's Italian.

They're not really that similar

Trump is a TV personality. Berlusconi owns TV networks.
Trump is rich. Berlusconi is much, much richer, more than 2 times the net worth of Trump
Trump got into politics to make more money. Berlusconi got into politics to stay out of prison
Trump's charisma comes from "saying it like it is" and being an alpha male. Berlusconi's charisma comes from a charming, funny personality and decades of massive propaganda on every media
They're both womanizers but Berlusconi trumps Trump on the issue with massive use of prostitutes for personal and political gain

Maybe there is something wrong with politics if it's mostly used by douchebags to get richer and/or avoid prison
Maybe there is something wrong with politics if the politicians don't represent the people

Maybe I'm just silly and this is how it always ends up, but I think it's probably a problem

At least trump and Berlusconi are up front about their douche baggery

I will punch you in the face

you now have to vote for me because at least I told you I am going to punch you in the face

He's just riding public opinion. Its the same sort of A-B testing he's been doing since the primaries.

But games already self regulate, maybe if parents actually did their job and didn't give their mentally unhinged immature kids games that are clearly labelled for mature audiences only.... there wouldn't be any sodding difference anyway because the little retard would just entertain himself pulling legs off spiders and shoving fireworks up cats arses

Yes I know
>le cuck Oliver
>le current year meme

but once you filter out the inevitable leftist propaganda, it's still an accurate portrayal of the upcoming elections, especially for what he says at the end: due to how the system works, it's almost guaranteed that none of the current candidates will actually end up as prime minister

[youtube]LdhQzXHYLZ4[/youtube]

Also he left out what I think is the best photo of the iconic duo, Putin playing with Berlusconi's dog

filtering out the leftist propaganda is as impossible as filtering the far-right propaganda in this thread
but since it aligns more with my views it's objectively more tolerable
objectively because the left is objectively right

CosmicScientist wrote:It's actually easy to filter out the left when the youtube video isn't available in your country.

Have a dailymotion link https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6fay8y

CosmicScientist wrote:Europe's third largest economy? Who's fourth? Britain, France or Germany? I thought they had too much corruption to have an economy.

Well Italian industry is especially strong in aerospace and military sectors, among other things. Our anti-personnel mines are were (we banned mine production in the 90's for some reason) world-renowned for their reliability when it comes to stripping pesky rebels of their limbs. The rest of the industry suffered greatly from EU regulations more than corruption.

Also clashes between extremists and the police (or other extremists) are a common occurence in Italy, it's not like in the US where a couple students waving bike locks make international news.

cedarbridge wrote:

[Definitely not biased.jpg]

Local president declares war on and slaughters entire muslim world, planet grateful.

Grazyn wrote:

CosmicScientist wrote:Europe's third largest economy? Who's fourth? Britain, France or Germany? I thought they had too much corruption to have an economy.

Well Italian industry is especially strong in aerospace and military sectors, among other things. Our anti-personnel mines are were (we banned mine production in the 90's for some reason) world-renowned for their reliability when it comes to stripping pesky rebels of their limbs. The rest of the industry suffered greatly from EU regulations more than corruption.

Also clashes between extremists and the police (or other extremists) are a common occurence in Italy, it's not like in the US where a couple students waving bike locks make international news.

Olive oil is worth a lot of money, at one point Filippo Berio was in trouble for using boot legged olive oil from the mafia and selling it as extra virgin olive oil.

Anonmare wrote:

cedarbridge wrote:[img].[/img]

[Definitely not biased.jpg]

You mean there's something off about a chart claiming that deaths caused by communist leaders are all "disputed" but then proceeds to attribute to the Ascension of the Great Demon Lord Drumpf the immediate "projected" anhillation of all non-white people and gays? It sounds like some of the best 40k fanfiction.

For some reason Churchill is credited for the nuking of japs but not the firebombing of krauts.

Malkevin wrote:For some reason Churchill is credited for the nuking of japs but not the firebombing of krauts.

to be fair I doubt the person making that chart is aware that the firebombing of Tokyo had a higher death toll than either of the atomic bombs, "being aware that Dresden is a place" is perhaps wishing too much

I like how they ignored all of Obummer's drone striking too, though I'm too tired to get projected numbers on that

I don't get why people make such a stink about when Japan got nuked. They repeatedly refused to surrender and if we hadn't nuked them god knows how many more people would have died before Japan finally gave up, certainly more than nuking the two cities killed.

im sure the countless civilians that died that day were okay with it as well because "this way there is less casualties".

ColonicAcid wrote:im sure the countless civilians that died that day were okay with it as well because "this way there is less casualties".

Yeah, if only all the mean people just stopped fighting right?

The atomic bombinga of japan made people realize that maybe we shouldn't have a global war every 10 years. Without the specter of nuclear armageddon overhead some jerk would have started another world war, probably over something stupid like a pigeon getting shot or something.

i think it was a necessity.

i dont really see the non-chalant handwaving about it tho.

ColonicAcid wrote:i think it was a necessity.

i dont really see the non-chalant handwaving about it tho.

It's debated weather or not it was necessary as the Japanese knew the soviets were coming and were considering surrendering to the Allies anyway because a soviet occupation was a pretty scary prospect for them. Although in saying that there were plenty of dumbfuck hardliners stating they should fight to the end and it's difficult to say what exactly would have happened if we didn't drop two WMD's.

Sometinyprick wrote:

ColonicAcid wrote:i think it was a necessity.

i dont really see the non-chalant handwaving about it tho.

It's debated weather or not it was necessary as the Japanese knew the soviets were coming and were considering surrendering to the Allies anyway because a soviet occupation was a pretty scary prospect for them. Although in saying that there were plenty of dumbfuck hardliners stating they should fight to the end and it's difficult to say what exactly would have happened if we didn't drop two WMD's.

They didn't surrender after the first, so I doubt not dropping one would have been any different.

They technically surrendered after the first, didn't they?

besides they turned out all right

The worst thing the yanks did to the japs was introduce censorship laws.

Yep, it's america's fault japanese women have square vaginas.

I hate that I get worked up about things

Alright, so Dick's decided they would no longer carry """""assault-style""""" rifles, and that's their choice and I respect that
But the wording is so fucking stupid
It's not an assault style weapon, it is a semi-automatic rifle like the thousands of other brands you carry, just in black metal and plastic instead of metal and wood
I know it's just a political move, which irks me more
They aren't doing it out of a genuine care for loss of life, they're doing it so people don't start boycotting THEM next


That's another thing, those companies dropping NRA partnerships just because people have their panties in a twist, grow the fuck up, most of the people complaining don't have the funds to dent your bottom line if they choose not to buy the plane ticket they couldn't afford anyway

Takeguru i smashed my head against a window and punched myself seven times in the face at aork today over that news so dont feel like youre getting too worked up

Im just so fucking angry about all the fucking lives lost to try and prevent communism over years and the fucking bastards slipped in and took over our fucking nation without firing a single shot because they took over the damn television

My only joy is that all the commie fucks will end up dead in 20 years because of climate change brought on by their constant stream of bullshit pumped into the air so they can dose the proles with their electric gizmos

Good news is that nobody trust the media for shit any more

Super Aggro Crag wrote:Takeguru i smashed my head against a window and punched myself seven times in the face at aork today over that news so dont feel like youre getting too worked up

Im just so fucking angry about all the fucking lives lost to try and prevent communism over years and the fucking bastards slipped in and took over our fucking nation without firing a single shot because they took over the damn television

My only joy is that all the commie fucks will end up dead in 20 years because of climate change brought on by their constant stream of bullshit pumped into the air so they can dose the proles with their electric gizmos

Did you literally cry as well? Are you shaking right now?

Fuck your toys get a hobby that won't put a hole through you.

Takeguru wrote: It's not an assault style weapon, it is a semi-automatic rifle like the thousands of other brands you carry, just in black metal and plastic instead of metal and wood
I know it's just a political move, which irks me more

I know if I went on a shooting spree my weapon of choice would be a sexy wooden stocked M14, YUM: seven six two, full... metal...jacket. You think that wooden table against the door is going to stop the bullets? Ha, think again.

Nobody posting about that Hogg guy apparently being the son of a guy who is in the business of crisis management and simulation?
Or that people reported multiple shooters and one such shooter was wearing a gas mask and full tactical gear+armour?

Why is it that all of these big, heavily publicized shootings and events all seem to have a lot of shit about them? Like that boston marathon where there were a shitload of pictures straight up contradicting the official narrative. Why is it always looking sketchy?

Better go stalk down relatives of the victims and call them actors then you genius.

And here i was thinking child actors were shit...

Turns out theyre really fuckin good

All this gun control bs is a plot by the Russians

Once the gun grabbers annihilate our freedom the russians are gonna drop paratroopers and start rounding up and killing civilians like in red dawn

http://miami.cbslocal.com/2018/02/27/fl ... book-deal/

The whole thing is pretty simple and the amount of predictable as shit politics around it is par for the course.

Hogg: Either trying to use his proximity to the event to jumpstart a journalism career via mass media exposure, being puppeteered by media to push a pre-screened narrative about gun control and MHC funding or both. You can tell there's something not entirely right about how he repeats specific talking points. All of his major media appearances follow a similar script and hit a series of specific talking points. So basically its either self-interest, he's being abused by the system, or both.

Gun """"control"""": Same song second verse, same as the first. There's never going to be a tragedy with so much as a whiff of a firearm that gun """"control"""" proponents won't use to push that agenda and who needs to wait for the bodies to even be cold when we've got 24/7 new coverage and assholes begging for corpse photos on twitter.

Corporate grandstanding: Boards of directors are designed for only one thing, keep the share cost high and turn whatever profit is required to do it. This means that all sorts of causes "putting pressure" on the company to do whatever the fuck will result in the corporation caving just to dodge some temporary negative press. Its all about as useful as Twitter moral grandstanding but with the added effect of pissing off whatever market you were courting in the first place by offering the given discount or product. I promise. In 6-8 months, nobody that isn't a political "activist" or pundit is going to remember what companies do and don't offer discounts to NRA members. But I promise the people who got those discounts will remember who decided to stop offering them discounts they used in order to score points with people that didn't get those same deals or discounts. Cutting ties with customers to appease people who are not your customers is a tried and true bad move. You can see it in how people who hate the NRA respond to the news that Delta was no longer offering their discount to NRA members to see what I mean here. "Wow Delta you just gained this customer." No they didn't. You never were their customer and you're not going to rush out to buy a plane ticket to nowhere just because they took a political potshot at somebody you dislike. I've never seen a correlation between the two things in any context but sales experience tells me you don't cut off current customers to chase prospective customers for reasons entirely unrelated to your product.

It's also the physical location of the /tg/station server

Because of the most American superhero, Florida Man.