oranges wrote:I'm happy to accommodate nu-age outragers, as long as there's more of them
Okay, you posted your gay quote about perfection, here is a very straight quote by Socrates.
>"If you were setting out to sea, who would you ideally want deciding who was in charge of the vessel, just anyone, or people educated in the rules and demands of seafaring?"
Most people are not game designers. If you allow a 50.1% majority to decide the path of the game you're just gambling. Do you really think this is a productive method of game design, to brainlessly follow whatever the largest number of people want? This is exactly what has landed SS13 in such a sorry state, the fact that it has no solid leadership behind its development, just a schizophrenic spam of random ideas by hundreds of people. Further scatterbraining the direction of the game by polling players on what is and isn't good is not a step forward.
By the way, as for "You have achieved perfection not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is no thing left to take away.", characterizing this blatant moral censorship as some kind of beautiful reductionist game design thing is ridiculous. This has nothing to do with simplifying the game, you aren't going to start removing the gigantic tumorous masses of bullshit that have accumulated on the codebase over the years. You're post rationalizing censorship as something it isn't.