/tg/Station 13

Bottom post of the previous page:

Super Aggro Crag wrote:

Vekter wrote:To absolutely nobody's shock nothing has really changed on the servers aside from a few idiots being yeeted for screaming about how much they hate minorities.

So I'd say this change was a success.

Except the people screaming antifa horseshit in OOC now, yeah.

I mean you could have gotten rid of those people without changing the rules just by banning them for being a dick and taking the server off the hub since those sort of goobs only show up on the stinky pub container hells from what I've seen.

oranges wrote:well unless you signed yourself up to get CBT by being an admin or forum mod or something

bobbahbrown wrote:i wasn't really paying attention to this thread but i was just reading it and wanted to say that ned was just reacting to what he thought was going on and i don't blame him for that and i don't think you guys should either, we have all had a time where we jumped on something that we were concerned about before. he was nice to me before that event and he's been nice after, i really don't think he was trying to be rude but instead trying to protect against what he thought was going on

if anything it helped me to clarify the data security stuff and make sure that everything was more transparent

and on top of that i say this a lot but scrubby and Statbus serve two different purposes with two different sources of data and you can't really compare them, apples and oranges y'know. they're complimentary, not competition to each other

sincerely and all the best,
bobbah "bee" brown

oranges wrote:

terranaut wrote:

actioninja wrote:

Skelus wrote: If you can play blackface but cant make jabs at nogs while you do it then what is the difference between that and saying "lol fuck you nigger" or laughing at the expense of black crew IC.
Is it unacceptable to spraypaint your face white as a black character and act as boring, productive, and well spoken as possible?
I can already see the Neue-adminstration, henceforth referred to as the soy-administration is already stumbling over giving us a defining line on muh big-o-tree and muh harassment and thats why this new rule is trash.
Frankly the timing of this shiny new rule reeks of social signalling on behalf of a dead multiple-felon.
Here at TG we care about [Progressive issue of the week] Thats why we are taking action against [Concept that makes trans-flag/hammer-and-sickle upset]

I should start making a tally for how many posts it takes for "reasonable posters concerned about censorship" to start posting blatant /pol/ tier garbage.

this retard exists on both sides
there's "can we maybe not censor speech" and "can we maybe not say the n-word" as the reasonable people and then there's retards like skelus on the one side and retards who are gonna start foaming at every imagined and perceived slight like that clown who reported crags post
clearly the common enemy we have is retards

ArcaneDefence wrote:

oranges wrote:well unless you signed yourself up to get CBT by being an admin or forum mod or something

[youtube]OKWVNeDYZmU[/youtube]

Naloac wrote:

Stickymayhem wrote:

david moment

whats the other reason WHATS THE OTHER REASON IKE WE HAVE TO KNOW

Vekter wrote:5 pages later and this thread still sucks

oranges wrote:it must be quite upsetting for you to sit here as tg steadfastly refuses to implode as you wish it then?

iksyp wrote:when people stop being divisve assholes for no reason

Vekter wrote:This thread rocks.

Today fucking rocks.

Vekter wrote:5 pages later and this thread still sucks

FloranOtten wrote:

Skelus wrote:

Cobby wrote:Blackface appearance only is fine but be careful not to do anything that could be perceived as a racist jab at blacks.

This had better be a bad case of satire so help me.

If you play as a blackface character, then start talking in a stereotypical accent about stealing and loving chicken, you're getting bwoinked.

Rohesie wrote:

FloranOtten wrote:

Skelus wrote:

Cobby wrote:Blackface appearance only is fine but be careful not to do anything that could be perceived as a racist jab at blacks.

This had better be a bad case of satire so help me.

If you play as a blackface character, then start talking in a stereotypical accent about stealing and loving chicken, you're getting bwoinked.

This attempt at a compromise is sad.

cacogen wrote:I think what Cobby meant is it's fine to roleplay a different ethnicity provided it isn't a racist stereotype?

Stickymayhem wrote:

cacogen wrote:I think what Cobby meant is it's fine to roleplay a different ethnicity provided it isn't a racist stereotype?

this is a level of nuance no one in this thread is capable of

either you can play as tyrone watermelon or you can only play using our new webcam face scanning system as your precise ethnicity and gender there is no middle ground

being a centrist is literally worse than going to hell - jesus christ, 1 B.C.E.

Togopal wrote:[youtube]YYRu4wuPiQM[/youtube]

BONERMASTER wrote:

bobbahbrown wrote:i wasn't really paying attention to this thread but i was just reading it and wanted to say that ned was just reacting to what he thought was going on and i don't blame him for that and i don't think you guys should either, we have all had a time where we jumped on something that we were concerned about before. he was nice to me before that event and he's been nice after, i really don't think he was trying to be rude but instead trying to protect against what he thought was going on

if anything it helped me to clarify the data security stuff and make sure that everything was more transparent

and on top of that i say this a lot but scrubby and Statbus serve two different purposes with two different sources of data and you can't really compare them, apples and oranges y'know. they're complimentary, not competition to each other

sincerely and all the best,
bobbah "bee" brown

Bobbah, when you run a store one day, in the hypothetical case of me entering your store and smashing & looting it blind, it will only be because I have some doubts about your accounting balance, and if nothing turns up afterwards, I will of course apologize, and I want you to know that I'm only doing this because I'm worried that you may be doing something shady and risky that could end you up in trouble!

Sincerely best wishes,
Bonermaster

FloranOtten wrote:Imagine attacking someone for not being upset enough at something that affects them lmao

Ayy Lemoh wrote:

Togopal wrote:[youtube]YYRu4wuPiQM[/youtube]

Yeah, OK, Togopal, I guess you could consider that an event. What I'd consider an event would be something actually fun and engaging for the players. In reality, half of the playerbase sat out dead, gibbed, unable to play while the lucky players just manage to get all the fun. If this is going to be a pattern for your "events' (Admin Abuse) then I'd prefer you just stopped while you're ahead. Next time this happens, there will be an admin complaint. You have been warned.

Togopal wrote: יום הדין שלו בפתח נהרות המשרתים יזרום באדום המדמם של הכופרים ואלה שבוחרים לחיות את חייהם עם תאוות בצע ולעיתים נדרותהפכו לייסורים לנצח נצ

Stickymayhem wrote:

cacogen wrote:I think what Cobby meant is it's fine to roleplay a different ethnicity provided it isn't a racist stereotype?

this is a level of nuance no one in this thread is capable of

either you can play as tyrone watermelon or you can only play using our new webcam face scanning system as your precise ethnicity and gender there is no middle ground

oranges wrote:Wowwwww, you meow like a cat! That means you are one, right? Shut the fuck up. If you really want to be put on a leash and treated like a domestic animal then that’s called a fetish, not “quirky” or “cute”. What part of you seriously thinks that any part of acting like a feline establishes a reputation of appreciation? Is it your lack of any defining aspect of personality that urges you to resort to shitty representations of cats to create an illusion of meaning in your worthless life? Wearing “cat ears” in the shape of headbands further notes the complete absence of human attribution to your false sense of personality, such as intelligence or charisma in any form or shape. Where do you think this mindset’s gonna lead you? You think you’re funny, random, quirky even? What makes you think that acting like a fucking cat will make a goddamn hyena laugh? I, personally, feel extremely sympathetic towards you as your only escape from the worthless thing you call your existence is to pretend to be an animal. But it’s not a worthy choice to assert this horrifying fact as a dominant trait, mainly because personality traits require an initial personality to lay their foundation on. You’re not worthy of anybody’s time, so go fuck off, “cat-girl”.

VexingRaven wrote:This is a terrible analogy because it's his own site he shut down. It's more like he thinks you're buying up all his axes because you're an axe murderer so he shutters his doors in your face until you clarify that, no, you're just cutting down a whole forest and for some reason can't use a chainsaw.

BONERMASTER wrote:

VexingRaven wrote:This is a terrible analogy because it's his own site he shut down. It's more like he thinks you're buying up all his axes because you're an axe murderer so he shutters his doors in your face until you clarify that, no, you're just cutting down a whole forest and for some reason can't use a chainsaw.

Go back to your main account, and shut the fuck up, I'm done talking about this shit here.

wesoda25 wrote:I mean has a lot even happened?

Vekter wrote:

wesoda25 wrote:I mean has a lot even happened?

Not really, some of the more toxic elements on the server left to go either make their own server (which died) or just quit and we banned a handful of people for being shitty. It's been a pretty positive change.

saprasam wrote:

Vekter wrote:

wesoda25 wrote:I mean has a lot even happened?

Not really, some of the more toxic elements on the server left to go either make their own server (which died) or just quit and we banned a handful of people for being shitty. It's been a pretty positive change.

if you ban all the shitters who's gonna cause conflict when the antags are too busy being dead

Vekter wrote:

saprasam wrote:

Vekter wrote:

wesoda25 wrote:I mean has a lot even happened?

Not really, some of the more toxic elements on the server left to go either make their own server (which died) or just quit and we banned a handful of people for being shitty. It's been a pretty positive change.

if you ban all the shitters who's gonna cause conflict when the antags are too busy being dead

Ghost roles or events. Next.

saprasam wrote:

Vekter wrote:

wesoda25 wrote:I mean has a lot even happened?

Not really, some of the more toxic elements on the server left to go either make their own server (which died) or just quit and we banned a handful of people for being shitty. It's been a pretty positive change.

if you ban all the shitters who's gonna cause conflict when the antags are too busy being dead

Screemonster wrote:

saprasam wrote:

Vekter wrote:

wesoda25 wrote:SNOP

did you know that you can cause conflict without doing a racism in ooc

saprasam wrote:

Screemonster wrote:

saprasam wrote:

Vekter wrote:

wesoda25 wrote:SNOP

did you know that you can cause conflict without doing a racism in ooc

i mean the ones who beat eachother up and cause silly shit ingame you doltathoid

saprasam wrote:ok you want me to get real? ok i'll get real

Vekter wrote: Very, very valid feedback. You should definitely bring this to the coders' attention. This isn't sarcasm - you make a good point and I have also noticed that rounds really start to drag after a while. We might need to tweak event probabilities.

Screemonster wrote:

saprasam wrote:

Vekter wrote:

wesoda25 wrote:I mean has a lot even happened?

Not really, some of the more toxic elements on the server left to go either make their own server (which died) or just quit and we banned a handful of people for being shitty. It's been a pretty positive change.

if you ban all the shitters who's gonna cause conflict when the antags are too busy being dead

did you know that you can cause conflict without doing a racism in ooc

Rohen_Tahir wrote:

Screemonster wrote:

saprasam wrote:

Vekter wrote:

wesoda25 wrote:I mean has a lot even happened?

Not really, some of the more toxic elements on the server left to go either make their own server (which died) or just quit and we banned a handful of people for being shitty. It's been a pretty positive change.

if you ban all the shitters who's gonna cause conflict when the antags are too busy being dead

did you know that you can cause conflict without doing a racism in ooc

But, as mentioned in a previous thread on the toppic, there is a huge overlap between the demonic legion of racism and petty griefers.