Bottom post of the previous page:
Yea, they’ll use any kind of broken logic to tell anyone they disagree with they’re wrong. They literally state your own point back to you as though it’s some kind of rebuttal of what you said. Never mind ever addressing the fact that this is a GAME and the entire purpose of coding anything at all for it is for the enjoyment of the people PLAYING the GAME. Why should they get zero say while coders, many of whom barely play, if at all, are the end-all be-all of what is implemented?JStheguy wrote:"Why do we have feedback threads if the only feedback that matters is Oranges'?"somerandomguy wrote:Usually it gets merged unless your code is bad, your feature is unbalanced, or it conflicts with oranges' vision for the gameMark9013100 wrote:Except that's what I did and my PR got shot down.Actionb wrote: This is where the phrase "learn 2 code" comes in - even if you had the best ideas, you cannot force a volunteer coder to implement them; you would have to do it youself.
It would help if you could link it so I could see
"Just learn to code, you'll be able get your changes in easily, as long as Oranges is okay with it."
And to the jackass saying this is what he admin elections are for, you know that’s absolutely asinine. Doesn’t really matter what they decide if the coders can just remove whatever it is and say it doesn’t fit their “vision.”
Just cut the shit and admit nobody really in charge gives a fuck what the players want. Oranges has made clear plenty of times how much he loathes the players for deigning to think they have any say in a game they play a hell of a lot more than he does.
