Secborgs

[Rohen_Tahir]

If elected, will you try to bring back secborgs?

[RaveRadbury]

No, from what I understand secborgs were problematic and not fun. I would not be interested in bringing them back.

[mrmelbert]

One of my earliest memories of the game was getting stunlocked by an asimov secborg in a spaced room and dying because of it.

No, secborgs are unfun demon silicons that take the validborg mindset to the extreme.

[Mothblocks]

No.

[Timberpoes]

Keep secborgs kill.

For every borgo main that ask for secborg return, also kill favourite borgo model.

Eventually end with only grey martial aid borgo wit no modulies.

Satisfied.

[kieth4]

These are op and cause nothing but grief, no.

[Cimika]

Nope, also unsure if this should be an admin concern - Sounds like a code thing.

[RaveRadbury]

Nope, also unsure if this should be an admin concern - Sounds like a code thing.

Secborgs are in the config and disabled. It's absolutely a headmin issue.

[dragomagol]

I don't think bringing them back is a good idea. Borgs and security don't mix.

[Cimika]

Nope, also unsure if this should be an admin concern - Sounds like a code thing.

Secborgs are in the config and disabled. It's absolutely a headmin issue.

Thanks for letting me know. My answer is the same with these new informations. Unless changes are made to them, I don't intend on supporting their comeback.

[Arcanemusic]

From a code perspective they're fine to keep in the code as a dangerous tool and to have as a rare, spooky panic attack one in every hundred shifts.

But as they are now, and as they were? Oh holy hell, no. It probably shouldn't even be a config, if we're being honest. They are absolute monsters in terms of the chaos and spite they provide.

They have all the upsides of being a borg, and all the tools of the worst security on the station, all mixed with a little winky face saying "Don't misuse these tools or you might get ahelped! uwu"

[Mailbox]

No.

[Stickymayhem]

Keep them in the game as an admin option for events.

Otherwise no.