Bottom post of the previous page:
This pleaseoranges wrote:can we have a third impeachement? it's kind of fun to watch americans frothing about it
We already knew he wouldn't be convicted of anything, but it was still entertaining
Bottom post of the previous page:
This pleaseoranges wrote:can we have a third impeachement? it's kind of fun to watch americans frothing about it
Isn't Biden supposed to be a one-term president anyway?cacogen wrote:He's an autistic man with zero self-awareness and no desire to learn. From what I read the democrats and independents all voted to impeach him but didn't have the numbers to get the 2/3 majority needed alone and by being acquitted he has the opportunity to run again in 2024. Which is good, because such a popular potential republican candidate puts pressure on Joe to be less shit by actually making meaningful reforms if he doesn't want to be a one term president. Optimally they both die before then.chocolate_bickie wrote:If this was DnD Trump would be chaotic evil who maxed charisma.cacogen wrote:THE GOOD GUYS™ CAN'T STOP #WINNING
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/impeac ... 5WZFOMPLE/
(this not very good paper was the first result so you should find your own preferred source of spin)
I-I'M GONNA LET THIS ONE SLIDEGrazyn wrote:I mean, considering he was supposed to be a 0-term president...
Because he's a fucking moderate! Soon enough the dems will nominate a commie and we'll be fucked!XSI wrote:I'd be a little surprised if he's still alive and conscious at the end of 4 years
But if he makes it there, why would they not try to keep him in?
joooks wrote:Quoting a legend, at least im not a faggot lolNaloac wrote:
In short, this appeal is denied. Suck my nuts retard.
See you in 12 months unless you blacklist me for this
Timberpoes wrote: ↑ I'm going to admin timonk [...]. Fuck it, he's also now my second host vote if goof rejects.
pikeyeskey13 wrote: ↑ ok don't forget to shove it up your ass lmao oops u can delete this one I just wanted to make sure it went through
Agux909 wrote:Woah bravo there sir, post of the month you saved the thread. I feel overwhelmed by the echo of unlimited wisdom and usefulness sprouting from you post. Every Manuel player now feels embarrased to exist because of your much NEEDED wise words, you sure teached'em all, you genius, IQ lord.Timonk wrote:This is why we make fun of Manuel
quit being a buzzkill you fuckTimonk wrote:^ republican bait
Trump lost get over itthehogshotgun wrote: hurr durr
joooks wrote:Quoting a legend, at least im not a faggot lolNaloac wrote:
In short, this appeal is denied. Suck my nuts retard.
See you in 12 months unless you blacklist me for this
Timberpoes wrote: ↑ I'm going to admin timonk [...]. Fuck it, he's also now my second host vote if goof rejects.
pikeyeskey13 wrote: ↑ ok don't forget to shove it up your ass lmao oops u can delete this one I just wanted to make sure it went through
Agux909 wrote:Woah bravo there sir, post of the month you saved the thread. I feel overwhelmed by the echo of unlimited wisdom and usefulness sprouting from you post. Every Manuel player now feels embarrased to exist because of your much NEEDED wise words, you sure teached'em all, you genius, IQ lord.Timonk wrote:This is why we make fun of Manuel
Timonk wrote:Trump lost get over itthehogshotgun wrote: hurr durr
You know our party electing a non moderate would be pretty cool considering you guys always get real conservativesthehogshotgun wrote:Because he's a fucking moderate! Soon enough the dems will nominate a commie and we'll be fucked!XSI wrote:I'd be a little surprised if he's still alive and conscious at the end of 4 years
But if he makes it there, why would they not try to keep him in?
Stickymayhem wrote:Imagine the sheer narcisssim required to genuinely believe you are this intelligent.
Sanders was fucked because the dems are looking for moderates. A lot of news sources ignored sanders entirely at the request of other news sites and DNCXivilaiAnaxes wrote:I mean Sanders ran twice and lost to a moderately likeable guy and an incredibly hated crone.
Granted his failure was more his own fault for refusing to ever go on the offensive even when the party is obviously fucking him.
Stickymayhem wrote:Imagine the sheer narcisssim required to genuinely believe you are this intelligent.
I didn't really follow the primaries but I was under the impression Sanders had a pretty radical platform, wasn't it the reason he was called a socialist? Also no attacking your own party isn't a great idea unless you are already the most popular guy in the party (like Trump and the GOP), and people tend to not like whiners who don't have at least a few wins under their beltXivilaiAnaxes wrote:No way, Sanders failed to get voters because he failed to act proactively.
All of Sanders moves were either basic talking points or purely passive reactions to other campaign's attacks on him.
The dems split his vote this year's primaries, guy doesn't even bother to address the glaring party strategy to screw him over while fucking Trump of all people is commenting on it. Black protestors take his mic on stage, guy just sits there while they take a giant shit on the political campaign of the candidate that actually gives a slight fuck about them. He could have done anything to actually engage with them and make it a huge positive note for his campaign, guy just sits there like a pariah at the school dance, while the two morons just shriek at the audience. I can't think of a single Sanders campaign move other than "Yeah here's my positions", which is less of a move and more of an expectation. Honestly imo it's a great life lesson - guy refused to act to seize the win, basically sat around with the attitude of "if the Americans want me they'll vote for me whatever man" *shrug*.
Unironically, if Sanders were a winner it wouldn't have been close.
I don't like how 'international finance and corporation supporting guy open to warmongering' is the western standard for 'moderate'Armhulen wrote:You know our party electing a non moderate would be pretty cool considering you guys always get real conservativesthehogshotgun wrote:Because he's a fucking moderate! Soon enough the dems will nominate a commie and we'll be fucked!XSI wrote:I'd be a little surprised if he's still alive and conscious at the end of 4 years
But if he makes it there, why would they not try to keep him in?
We didn’t invade the Middle East for oil you dumbass, that’s just a populist mythXSI wrote:I don't like how 'international finance and corporation supporting guy open to warmongering' is the western standard for 'moderate'Armhulen wrote:You know our party electing a non moderate would be pretty cool considering you guys always get real conservativesthehogshotgun wrote:Because he's a fucking moderate! Soon enough the dems will nominate a commie and we'll be fucked!XSI wrote:I'd be a little surprised if he's still alive and conscious at the end of 4 years
But if he makes it there, why would they not try to keep him in?
But then I guess 80+ years of coups in third world countries to force them to grow bananas/give up their resources and invading sand dunes for oil has worked to keep them in power, so it's clearly working for some of them
joooks wrote:Quoting a legend, at least im not a faggot lolNaloac wrote:
In short, this appeal is denied. Suck my nuts retard.
See you in 12 months unless you blacklist me for this
Timberpoes wrote: ↑ I'm going to admin timonk [...]. Fuck it, he's also now my second host vote if goof rejects.
pikeyeskey13 wrote: ↑ ok don't forget to shove it up your ass lmao oops u can delete this one I just wanted to make sure it went through
Agux909 wrote:Woah bravo there sir, post of the month you saved the thread. I feel overwhelmed by the echo of unlimited wisdom and usefulness sprouting from you post. Every Manuel player now feels embarrased to exist because of your much NEEDED wise words, you sure teached'em all, you genius, IQ lord.Timonk wrote:This is why we make fun of Manuel
Timonk wrote:what was it for then? the human rights hurting parts of Saudi arabia are still there
joooks wrote:Quoting a legend, at least im not a faggot lolNaloac wrote:
In short, this appeal is denied. Suck my nuts retard.
See you in 12 months unless you blacklist me for this
Timberpoes wrote: ↑ I'm going to admin timonk [...]. Fuck it, he's also now my second host vote if goof rejects.
pikeyeskey13 wrote: ↑ ok don't forget to shove it up your ass lmao oops u can delete this one I just wanted to make sure it went through
Agux909 wrote:Woah bravo there sir, post of the month you saved the thread. I feel overwhelmed by the echo of unlimited wisdom and usefulness sprouting from you post. Every Manuel player now feels embarrased to exist because of your much NEEDED wise words, you sure teached'em all, you genius, IQ lord.Timonk wrote:This is why we make fun of Manuel
You misinterpreted my expression "basic talking points", I meant it in that he would only ever say his policies over and over as opposed to his policies being what everyone else was spouting.Grazyn wrote:I didn't really follow the primaries but I was under the impression Sanders had a pretty radical platform, wasn't it the reason he was called a socialist?
This is the sentence actually that tells me you didn't follow the primaries. Trump started in vaguely the same boat as sanders - nonstandard policy talk, mostly political unknown. Trump didn't start "the most popular guy in the party", he 'earned' it after he basically day one WWE threw Jeb Bush (The heir apparent establishment candidate) into a trashcan by pointing out what a spineless human being he was. After that he spent practically the entire primaries with the talking point of "The Establishment dinosaurs all ganging up on me, I'm still gonna win lol".Grazyn wrote:Also no attacking your own party isn't a great idea unless you are already the most popular guy in the party (like Trump and the GOP), and people tend to not like whiners who don't have at least a few wins under their belt
Stickymayhem wrote:Imagine the sheer narcisssim required to genuinely believe you are this intelligent.
Cope anti-war pussyboyTimonk wrote:Aka "I try to get more influence over country to gain their resources but they sell them to China instead"
joooks wrote:Quoting a legend, at least im not a faggot lolNaloac wrote:
In short, this appeal is denied. Suck my nuts retard.
See you in 12 months unless you blacklist me for this
Timberpoes wrote: ↑ I'm going to admin timonk [...]. Fuck it, he's also now my second host vote if goof rejects.
pikeyeskey13 wrote: ↑ ok don't forget to shove it up your ass lmao oops u can delete this one I just wanted to make sure it went through
Agux909 wrote:Woah bravo there sir, post of the month you saved the thread. I feel overwhelmed by the echo of unlimited wisdom and usefulness sprouting from you post. Every Manuel player now feels embarrased to exist because of your much NEEDED wise words, you sure teached'em all, you genius, IQ lord.Timonk wrote:This is why we make fun of Manuel
you must vote democrat considering recent republican performances then lmaothehogshotgun wrote:You have far too much faith in Bernie supporters lol. Anyways the last thing we need is twice as much debt
>Unironically citing kraut and tea as a sourcethehogshotgun wrote:Timonk wrote:what was it for then? the human rights hurting parts of Saudi arabia are still there
5:00
I decided to see what kind of 'source' it was.actioninja wrote:>Unironically citing kraut and tea as a source
lmao
Stickymayhem wrote:Imagine the sheer narcisssim required to genuinely believe you are this intelligent.
I'm reading you say he didn't act proactively and hearing that he was spineless like Jeb! and lacked the people skills necessary to win people over. It's a shame because the meme at least is he had great policies and a great track record.XivilaiAnaxes wrote:No way, Sanders failed to get voters because he failed to act proactively.
All of Sanders moves were either basic talking points or purely passive reactions to other campaign's attacks on him.
The dems split his vote this year's primaries, guy doesn't even bother to address the glaring party strategy to screw him over while fucking Trump of all people is commenting on it. Black protestors take his mic on stage, guy just sits there while they take a giant shit on the political campaign of the candidate that actually gives a slight fuck about them. He could have done anything to actually engage with them and make it a huge positive note for his campaign, guy just sits there like a pariah at the school dance, while the two morons just shriek at the audience. I can't think of a single Sanders campaign move other than "Yeah here's my positions", which is less of a move and more of an expectation. Honestly imo it's a great life lesson - guy refused to act to seize the win, basically sat around with the attitude of "if the Americans want me they'll vote for me whatever man" *shrug*.
Unironically, if Sanders were a winner it wouldn't have been close.
technokek wrote:Cannot prove this so just belive me if when say this
Totally - he's a solid guy all around, at absolute worst I might think his understanding of economics and resource management might be a bit off he at least appears to genuinely want to make life better for everyone.cacogen wrote:I'm reading you say he didn't act proactively and hearing that he was spineless like Jeb! and lacked the people skills necessary to win people over. It's a shame because the meme at least is he had great policies and a great track record.
Stickymayhem wrote:Imagine the sheer narcisssim required to genuinely believe you are this intelligent.
AOC is just a left wing version of Trump where they have no idea how anything works yet is worshipped by people, just by redditards instead of 4chantards. If you’ve read some of her idiotic bills she knows jack shit. It’s crazy how these people laugh at trumpers for being indoctrinated whilst licking the boots of AOC. Plus she’s just fucking annoying, again like Trump she seems desperate for attentionBy contrast - AOC is actually fairly interesting. She'll blatantly accuse Ted Cruze of attempted murder and won't take people's shit laying down.
Long story short, we tricked America into thinking Saddam was making WMDsTimonk wrote:what was it for then? the human rights hurting parts of Saudi arabia are still there
Got some examples of idiot bills that show she doesn't know anything?thehogshotgun wrote:AOC is just a left wing version of Trump where they have no idea how anything works yet is worshipped by people, just by redditards instead of 4chantards. If you’ve read some of her idiotic bills she knows jack shit. It’s crazy how these people laugh at trumpers for being indoctrinated whilst licking the boots of AOC. Plus she’s just fucking annoying, again like Trump she seems desperate for attentionBy contrast - AOC is actually fairly interesting. She'll blatantly accuse Ted Cruze of attempted murder and won't take people's shit laying down.
kieth4 wrote: infrequently shitting yourself is fine imo
There is a lot of very bizarre nonsense being talked on this forum. I shall now remain silent and logoff until my points are vindicated.
Player who complainted over being killed for looting cap office wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2023 1:33 am Hey there, I'm Virescent, the super evil person who made the stupid appeal and didn't think it through enough. Just came here to say: screech, retards. Screech and writhe like the worms you are. Your pathetic little cries will keep echoing around for a while before quietting down. There is one great outcome from this: I rised up the blood pressure of some of you shitheads and lowered your lifespan. I'm honestly tempted to do this more often just to see you screech and writhe more, but that wouldn't be cool of me. So come on haters, show me some more of your high blood pressure please.![]()
Not-Dorsidarf wrote:Got some examples of idiot bills that show she doesn't know anything?thehogshotgun wrote:AOC is just a left wing version of Trump where they have no idea how anything works yet is worshipped by people, just by redditards instead of 4chantards. If you’ve read some of her idiotic bills she knows jack shit. It’s crazy how these people laugh at trumpers for being indoctrinated whilst licking the boots of AOC. Plus she’s just fucking annoying, again like Trump she seems desperate for attentionBy contrast - AOC is actually fairly interesting. She'll blatantly accuse Ted Cruze of attempted murder and won't take people's shit laying down.
you're just making this up entirely cause you dont like womenthehogshotgun wrote:Not-Dorsidarf wrote:Got some examples of idiot bills that show she doesn't know anything?thehogshotgun wrote:AOC is just a left wing version of Trump where they have no idea how anything works yet is worshipped by people, just by redditards instead of 4chantards. If you’ve read some of her idiotic bills she knows jack shit. It’s crazy how these people laugh at trumpers for being indoctrinated whilst licking the boots of AOC. Plus she’s just fucking annoying, again like Trump she seems desperate for attentionBy contrast - AOC is actually fairly interesting. She'll blatantly accuse Ted Cruze of attempted murder and won't take people's shit laying down.
Her “A just society” is built on faulty data and has many issues, but the one that I mainly know of is her suggestions of up to 70, 80% tax rates for the rich, due to America having such rates for a long time, ignoring the fact that the tax codes in that era had a ton of tax breaks and exceptions, something most tax historians would tell you. Of course AOC doesn’t care because she believes in eat the rich
You're talking to the people who vote Ted Cruz and company every senate electionoranges wrote:so you vote democrat right because you're about budget responsibility?
god these people are going to vote for ted cruz in 2024 and they have the fucking gall to continue showing their face in publicArmhulen wrote:You're talking to the people who vote Ted Cruz and company every senate electionoranges wrote:so you vote democrat right because you're about budget responsibility?
IkeTG wrote:you're just making this up entirely cause you dont like womenthehogshotgun wrote:Not-Dorsidarf wrote:Got some examples of idiot bills that show she doesn't know anything?thehogshotgun wrote:AOC is just a left wing version of Trump where they have no idea how anything works yet is worshipped by people, just by redditards instead of 4chantards. If you’ve read some of her idiotic bills she knows jack shit. It’s crazy how these people laugh at trumpers for being indoctrinated whilst licking the boots of AOC. Plus she’s just fucking annoying, again like Trump she seems desperate for attentionBy contrast - AOC is actually fairly interesting. She'll blatantly accuse Ted Cruze of attempted murder and won't take people's shit laying down.
Her “A just society” is built on faulty data and has many issues, but the one that I mainly know of is her suggestions of up to 70, 80% tax rates for the rich, due to America having such rates for a long time, ignoring the fact that the tax codes in that era had a ton of tax breaks and exceptions, something most tax historians would tell you. Of course AOC doesn’t care because she believes in eat the rich
oranges wrote:so you vote democrat right because you're about budget responsibility?
Stickymayhem wrote:Imagine the sheer narcisssim required to genuinely believe you are this intelligent.
why thoGrazyn wrote:Long story short, we tricked America into thinking Saddam was making WMDsTimonk wrote:what was it for then? the human rights hurting parts of Saudi arabia are still there
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niger_uranium_forgeries
cringeXivilaiAnaxes wrote:I do not acknowledge the superiority of deontological ethics.
XivilaiAnaxes wrote:Man honestly voting yellow is a legit waste of time don't bother.
Its not like in Australia where the third party will actually get a seat or two.
Do you even read the shit you type? They did the Iraq thing not for the oil but for them to sell oil to the US, which inevitably leads to them getting oil? Are you saying they were in it for the oil after all?XSI wrote: Also of course the Iraq thing wasn't literally to go get oil.
[...]
It was a combination of to make oil-producing countries sell in dollars for the petrodollar(Look at Libya too),
[...]
"For the oil" is just a reference to the petrodollar, which allows the US a much greater international power projection and helps the US currency so long as enough of the world's oil supply is sold only in dollars
joooks wrote:Quoting a legend, at least im not a faggot lolNaloac wrote:
In short, this appeal is denied. Suck my nuts retard.
See you in 12 months unless you blacklist me for this
Timberpoes wrote: ↑ I'm going to admin timonk [...]. Fuck it, he's also now my second host vote if goof rejects.
pikeyeskey13 wrote: ↑ ok don't forget to shove it up your ass lmao oops u can delete this one I just wanted to make sure it went through
Agux909 wrote:Woah bravo there sir, post of the month you saved the thread. I feel overwhelmed by the echo of unlimited wisdom and usefulness sprouting from you post. Every Manuel player now feels embarrased to exist because of your much NEEDED wise words, you sure teached'em all, you genius, IQ lord.Timonk wrote:This is why we make fun of Manuel
rich calling me a retard then lmaothehogshotgun wrote:I just don’t vote retard. Waiting for a good libertarian candidate
oranges wrote:rich calling me a retard then lmaothehogshotgun wrote:I just don’t vote retard. Waiting for a good libertarian candidate
The oil being sold to any country in US dollar is about power. The oil itself is not the issue. If they sold oil to China but forced China to pay in dollars then that would have worked too, that is what the petrodollar stuff is about. The US doesn't need middle eastern oil, it has plenty. But it does need the economic power from having it sold in dollarsTimonk wrote:Do you even read the shit you type? They did the Iraq thing not for the oil but for them to sell oil to the US, which inevitably leads to them getting oil? Are you saying they were in it for the oil after all?XSI wrote: Also of course the Iraq thing wasn't literally to go get oil.
[...]
It was a combination of to make oil-producing countries sell in dollars for the petrodollar(Look at Libya too),
[...]
"For the oil" is just a reference to the petrodollar, which allows the US a much greater international power projection and helps the US currency so long as enough of the world's oil supply is sold only in dollars
Users browsing this forum: Rogerstync