Bottom post of the previous page:
My form of non-intervention is in 'stop other people from intervening as well because otherwise one side will just dominate the other and force them to live by their rules', at which point whichever side isn't winning is going to be very unhappyLike I'm going to be okay with laws saying they're not allowed to kill/hurt/intimidate or otherwise just fuck with other people purely because of their lifestyle
But I also don't want to force churches to do gay marriage since that's directly against most religious customs. Also won't be forcing a synagogue to hold a christian wedding or anything silly like that
At that point things should be mostly good for both sides, assuming that people actually stick with the laws. Neither side will be 100% happy with this, but I think that the majority will be content enough to not push the matter onto attempting to dominate the other side and at the same time they will be able to live their own life
Though for (gay) marriage, I'd say a good start would be the removal of tax perks and government related bonuses people get for marrying. Clean up the tax code a bit and at the same time disconnect a religious service from the state, thus honouring the separation of church and state found throughout the western world. At that point gay people can go marry in any church that accepts them or have a secular ceremony and traditionalists can keep their own traditions.