/tg/Station 13

Putting u 1 brother gl

You might as well ban all terry sec players. Very much against this!!!

Not sure why anyone would play sec on terry if this went through

If your worried an entire class of players will stop playing because of being told to not kill other players as soon as allowed by the rule book perhaps ...

Hans wrote: ↑Mon Mar 17, 2025 5:34 am You might as well ban all terry sec players. Very much against this!!!

Not sure why anyone would play sec on terry if this went through

One issue voter here; rule 4 is important. If you play LRP you should care about no changes to rule 4....it makes gaming epic.

Strider had also hosted some very high quality events- do you have any videos of them if so could you post? I think it would be beneficial for ppl to see what you're ...

In all honesty I think as long as they’re not dragging people into it, it’s not the most immersion-killing thing ever. I used to do this sort of thing with Kanaga Siegrist, Randy Highlands, and whoever else I became friends with— and it just felt like goofing off in a world with defibrillators and ...

I have spoken to several people regarding this ban and how they feel you've progressed over the months.

It's been a mixed bag- however, I have had enough confidence from people saying that by blocking you are getting into fewer arguments and being less explosive and as this is what the ban was ...

Hello there, I have this seen this appeal- give me a few days to go over it and speak to people, thanks.

When you look at something like "roleplay" I think it's impossible to set expectations that make sense for everyone. - I think do the subjective nature of things like this it's very hard to define a baseline. Although I think to improve standards you need to start at the top and work your way down ...

I think that the problem here is how the game works, I've seen many a time where 3-4 capture a guy and spend forever deconverting them and then by the time they're deconned cult is like 1000x better and the guy like goes and gets reconned 30s later.

I do not think anyone should be forced to show ...

i know there are many data enjoyers but i'm not really one of them, i like to go off emotionally driven anecdotal evidence aka the vibes.

i propose that we make metastation the low population map by default.

this isn't a judgement on other maps at all, just the fact that meta is.......... the ...

NecromancerAnne Has retired.

Necromancer Anne has retired.

It's very hard to define because it depends on the situation. There are no banned words per se, it's vibe based- for that reason we have to say it's case by case than being able to really solidfy anything via words of even phrases because it's largely contextual.

Dreary has a good post, there is no ...

This is closed for now whilst we deal with internal situations that have arisen

This is closed for now whilst we deal with internal situations that have arisen

We had a talk about this and agreed that sentiment is important, from your description it sounds like it could meet the criteria for misogyny. As timber explained in this post, rule1 OR rule 11 are valid use cases in this situation.- we think this take describes it well;

"I want to think that ...

My take on this:

You should have a reasonable explanation for calling a borg bad, aka not following laws. Same vibes as someone just yelling "ARREST JOHN JONSON." Like if they're not Asimov and you're getting riled up and starting a lynch mob because the borg isn't listening to you, operator ...

"We will be amending this ruling. For the first death of the mime they are not valid for RR, just killing/beating up/ w/e. If after this they continue to speak they are valid to be removed.

Whilst we are here, we will also be adding a new ruling- clowns who refuse to put on shoes may be killed ...

We think that timber made a good post here;

"Existential threat to the station, or
Existential threat to the shuttle or its occupants, or
It just makes IC sense based on the unique factors of the shift."

but we would also like to add that; it should be based on what the current command who are ...

just go with the flow and don't sabotage your team
teams should make an effort to convert, but if someone gets killed because conversion was too inconvenient, shrug

from dreary;

"so i sort of think that it should be a case where you need to have a specific threat in mind to break out contraband, you can't just go "yeah i'm taking the desword on patrol fuck it"
but if it's like "omg space dragon/halo cultists/wizard/other big threat and i need to kill, open ...

I'm not a fan of this;

Tattle doesn't want to increase mechanical differences between mrp and LRP

and dreary doesn't want to config restrict antag availability like this.

Not a fan of this myself;

from dreary:

"i thought it was a good idea at the time but i don't think people are ready for it yet and i'm not sure we'd be able to enforce it fairly without some sort of overhaul to mrp, perhaps one day when goof's hrp server comes true, but for now i have to -1 it ...

Seems like everything was cleared up. Closing this.

This is a no, it's disabled whenever it has a reason to be disabled and is enabled when there are griefer waves and such.

Isolation cells are pretty much the same as RR. If they're not being used for that ahelp- or ahelp if you get chucked in one forever. Not much else can be done as their existence is a mapping thing and not an us thing.

We have decided to uphold this;

-avaster enters chemistry and drops rotting meat on the ground because they want an anthill to spawn on a specific tile (they never explain this.
- new player chemist keeps moving the rotting meat avaster dropped on the ground, each time avaster comes back and ...

We believe that the flavour text of rats sets the expectation of the role to be a minor nuisance, and as a minor nuisance in these smaller roles there should be an expectation that you're going to live a short life. we believe that if the regal rat is doing **literally** nothing to bother anyone ...

We view option A) A) Any law that restricts the AI's behavior in any way, regardless of its current relevancy, means the AI is not purged. Example: an AI with only the law "Prevent non-humans from coming to harm" is not purged even if no non-humans exist on the station, as the law still restricts ...

We have a 2-1 split not to disable this. At least for me, I like to know what map is coming up.

We view these as a roleplay suggestion without any actual real meaning. So it does not really matter what you set people to. The best advice I can give is communicate with security e.g I set this guy to sus because he was snooping where he shouldn't be.

Regarding this we have decided to keep the policy as is, we are happy with how it all interacts and see no reason to change it.

MRP Heretic cap 1>2.

I have raised it from 1>2. Please feedback here.

pray I do not raise it further

Edit: this is just a test, hypotheticals are good but whilst we're here we may as well let it run for a week or smth. Then, when the test period is over we (headmins) may have an informed vote on it

Absolutely against this, I do not believe the game's woes come from assistant players. I do not believe thst forcing people into jobs will suddenly increase quality.

Threat curve centre up by 0.1.

We believe that mechs being too strong in that scenario is a code issue and the codebase is free to make changes as they see fit to work on this. The other issue that you have we believe is a more ic thing- if security wants to they are fully able to clamp down on mechs. In that regard, we feel that ...

We have discussed this internally and there is not much interest amongst us for this, sorry. Dreary already dropped a fat paragraph whilst I myself do cannot say I have many deeper thoughts.

" i'm extremely wary of generalized, sweeping policy which enforces a single outcome regardless of the nuance of the situation. in that same vein, i'm also against this mindset being used against players in the way of writing and enforcing rules/policy which make no attempt to consider the context ...

GamerAndYeahMick has returned!! Yippee!!

GamerAndYeahMick has returned!

"they're restricted so you will need a reason to cause death and destruction with the items you receive, but admins should be more lenient on gimmicks which rely on an item the spy was able to gain through bounties. we don't expect spies to work for items and then never get to use them."

We're happy with how the current rules are set up, no interest in changing anything. Rule 0 precedent already covers this well we feel.

We are going to have a look at dynamic and probably re-shuffle a lot of threat/antags/shit at some point. It's pretty complex, but when we do it we'll hit manny too.

We are going to raise it by 5 now, if there is any success we will raise it by a further 5.

We've tested this and I've spoken to jaq, asked him to raise iron slightly so you can tank through gulag even if you're unlucky.

Otherwise with good rng you can sweep it with bad rng it sucks. Hopefully the changes make it more consistent.

As this is something that interests me heavily (I main sec ...

It's weird that the roleplay rules already have this solved; act like security, and be held to their standards.

We do have this as a headmin ruling:

Security standards can be applied to anyone acting as security, not just roundstart security officers.

Besides that I feel the same way I ...

We will test this at some point, then unlock the thread for feedback.

Although we are not going to move to ban the word outright- we encourage admins to use the rules to bop people who are using it to be bigoted or to harass other players. There is a difference between saying something out of frustration and OOCly attacking someone.

to quote dendy, i have no real ...

Search found 429 matches