Should be taken away.
Us spacists should (And many already have been) use more creative insults to deride the obviously inferior scalebound warmongers sometimes referred to as lizard"people".
Search found 93 matches
- Mon Feb 24, 2025 5:23 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: formal policy request to hard filter ligger post MSO
- Replies: 11
- Views: 307
- Sun Oct 27, 2024 4:37 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Allow Nicknames that follow Rule 3 Precedents
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1174
Re: Allow Nicknames that follow Rule 3 Precedents
This would take away the greatest advantage of playing a moth.
- Tue Oct 08, 2024 9:43 am
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: starcraft in ss13
- Replies: 5
- Views: 893
Re: starcraft in ss13
If the ashies 12 tendril rush me again Im not gonna GG
- Wed Sep 25, 2024 1:57 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: set in stone a weekly gaming session for sybil
- Replies: 35
- Views: 2804
- Tue Sep 03, 2024 12:06 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [<Jackraxxus>] Brickleebale - ban evassaion
- Replies: 6
- Views: 646
Re: [<Jackraxxus>] Brickleebale - ban evassaion
In the OOC tab u can check with the view admin remarks verb
or type it into the command line if u want
or type it into the command line if u want
- Tue Sep 03, 2024 11:51 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [<Jackraxxus>] Brickleebale - ban evassaion
- Replies: 6
- Views: 646
Re: [<Jackraxxus>] Brickleebale - ban evassaion
I'm glad I made more work for Justice by no one knowing who I am on discord so he got messaged instead of me.
As for how many hours I dunno the specifics it's not up to me. I'd wager like 50 - 100 (Maybe closer to 75 - 100?) but it might be worth asking someone smarter than me (Or the banning admin ...
As for how many hours I dunno the specifics it's not up to me. I'd wager like 50 - 100 (Maybe closer to 75 - 100?) but it might be worth asking someone smarter than me (Or the banning admin ...
- Tue Sep 03, 2024 5:21 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [<Jackraxxus>] Brickleebale - ban evassaion
- Replies: 6
- Views: 646
Re: [<Jackraxxus>] Brickleebale - ban evassaion
So glad my being permanently on offline mode on Discord made you message Justice instead gottem.
Your vouch isn't terrific (20 hours idk) but I've unbanned you on Osump. Don't mess this up my friend.
Also keep in mind you are still permanently banned from antagonist roles, and that's not my ban I ...
Your vouch isn't terrific (20 hours idk) but I've unbanned you on Osump. Don't mess this up my friend.
Also keep in mind you are still permanently banned from antagonist roles, and that's not my ban I ...
- Sat Aug 31, 2024 5:05 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: Uwubby2 Perma Ban Jaxarus
- Replies: 4
- Views: 411
Re: Uwubby2 Perma Ban Jaxarus
Ok so you werent added to the known alts thing so when u connected it said u were the alt of a banned account which I checked and was still banned so it's like this guy's 100% evading
I added u so it shouldnt happen again my bad gamer 10000% i fucked up i'll try not fucking up in future
I added u so it shouldnt happen again my bad gamer 10000% i fucked up i'll try not fucking up in future
- Sat Aug 31, 2024 5:03 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: Uwubby2 Perma Ban Jaxarus
- Replies: 4
- Views: 411
Re: Uwubby2 Perma Ban Jaxarus
If you wanna come back you'll still be in I'll have a post saying why I thought it was evasion in a sec
- Sat Aug 31, 2024 5:01 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: Uwubby2 Perma Ban Jaxarus
- Replies: 4
- Views: 411
Re: Uwubby2 Perma Ban Jaxarus
I FUCKED UP IM RETARDED
YOU'RE UNBANNED
YOU'RE UNBANNED
- Sun Aug 11, 2024 1:12 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Chems and Borgs
- Replies: 18
- Views: 1326
Re: Chems and Borgs
Haloperidol caps at 50 brain damage.
I argue with spook about this while we play dota 2 and I say it's not harm to make him mad but it's 100% harm.
Ppl are assumed to consent to surgery and healing stuff so libital and aiuri are fine imo (Like u dont need to ask 'pwetty pwease can i gib u aiuri to ...
I argue with spook about this while we play dota 2 and I say it's not harm to make him mad but it's 100% harm.
Ppl are assumed to consent to surgery and healing stuff so libital and aiuri are fine imo (Like u dont need to ask 'pwetty pwease can i gib u aiuri to ...
- Tue Aug 06, 2024 3:44 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Codifying a rule against friendly antagonists
- Replies: 44
- Views: 3480
Re: Codifying a rule against friendly antagonists
Antags already have too many rules that scare good players away from doing anything interesting, at least on MRP.
- Fri Jul 26, 2024 7:31 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Is private tgstation streaming allowed?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1294
Re: Is private tgstation streaming allowed?
Is privately streaming SS13 allowed in the following two circumstances:
1. To people that don't play SS13?
2. To people that do play SS13 but aren't currently playing?
1. Yeah
2. idk but it should be
If u join a round after having watched someone stream it u should be banned idc about the ...
- Sat Jul 20, 2024 4:47 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: ASIMOV and "Ligger"
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1368
Re: ASIMOV and "Ligger"
u know, i'm not a big supporter of clowning on ppl in PMs but if someone ahelps 'hey I was calling this stupid fucking warden a ligger and this goofy ass borg didnt throw itself in front of the lasers I was being shot with get that ass banned go admin boy go' I'd embed that one sec lizard image from ...
- Thu Jul 18, 2024 6:26 am
- Forum: Town Hall
- Topic: Trialmin Review: Xzero314
- Replies: 24
- Views: 2234
- Thu Jul 11, 2024 1:24 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Unauthorized AIs and Silicon Policy
- Replies: 45
- Views: 3945
Re: Unauthorized AIs and Silicon Policy
uhhhhh
the hop exist and no other job has protection from the hop adding more slots????
wtf is this argument?
Pretty sure every head of staff role has the combination of flags HEAD_OF_STAFF_JOB_FLAGS which you can check at line 248 of _Defines/jobs.dm and appears roughly around line 45ish of ...
- Sat Jul 06, 2024 6:41 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Should admins be allowed to participate in Peanut threads?
- Replies: 28
- Views: 1985
Re: Should admins be allowed to participate in Peanut threads?
especially the banning admin,
This is facts Mr Dingus and what an excellent point indeed
The banning admin should probably be heavily discouraged (or banned) from participating in the peanut thread
Unless they are speaking to the benefit of the player in question (For example dispelling ...
- Sat Jul 06, 2024 6:11 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Should admins be allowed to participate in Peanut threads?
- Replies: 28
- Views: 1985
Re: Should admins be allowed to participate in Peanut threads?
I think its fine, it can keep the thread healthy and generally is just good fun. It also makes it so admins arent just faceless banbots and you can actually get their opinions on things.
This is sQ fvcking trve admins being individuals and not some unknowable, unfathomable hivemind leads to ...
- Fri Jun 14, 2024 10:15 am
- Forum: Admin Feedback
- Topic: TheDuffelBag
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1640
- Thu Jun 13, 2024 6:59 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Remove the Firstname Lastname Requirement from Naming Policy
- Replies: 46
- Views: 3655
Re: Remove the Firstname Lastname Requirement from Naming Policy
literal fearmongering itt not everyone is gonna name themselves 'skibiditoilet' (Valid because it's a mononym)
We have casket the catgirl
Or had idk if they still play but that name was cool
I might be partial to goth catgirls tho :flushed: and also I think they got an exception for having OC art ...
We have casket the catgirl
Or had idk if they still play but that name was cool
I might be partial to goth catgirls tho :flushed: and also I think they got an exception for having OC art ...
- Thu Jun 06, 2024 6:50 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Unauthorized AIs and Silicon Policy
- Replies: 45
- Views: 3945
Re: Unauthorized AIs and Silicon Policy
Striders and Imitates are correct and also based.
- Sun Apr 14, 2024 5:01 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [<Jackraxxus>] Brickleebale - ban evassaion missunderstanding
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2639
Re: [<Jackraxxus>] Brickleebale - ban evassaion missunderstanding
i'd accept a vouch from cm
- Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:04 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [<Jackraxxus>] Brickleebale - ban evassaion missunderstanding
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2639
Re: [<Jackraxxus>] Brickleebale - ban evassaion missunderstanding
tgmc is different from /tg/ so the ban shouldnt be mirrored there
- Sat Apr 13, 2024 11:48 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [<Jackraxxus>] Brickleebale - ban evassaion missunderstanding
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2639
Re: [<Jackraxxus>] Brickleebale - ban evassaion missunderstanding
I'll give u that if u can find a vouch (Someone from another server who can tell our headmins that you're a cool dude who follows the rules) u can come back sooner then a year.
IDK where you'd get that vouch from tho. Maybe TGMC? I dont think we mirror our bans there. Maybe goon if you're not banned ...
IDK where you'd get that vouch from tho. Maybe TGMC? I dont think we mirror our bans there. Maybe goon if you're not banned ...
- Sat Apr 13, 2024 3:49 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [<Jackraxxus>] Brickleebale - ban evassaion missunderstanding
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2639
Re: [<Jackraxxus>] Brickleebale - ban evassaion missunderstanding
Though in your defence many of these notes are for exceptionally minor things like OOC in IC/IC in OOC.
Lemme go over some history that isn't just the exceptionally minor stuff (But some of it is)
On the 26th of November you are banned for a week for humping a player in maint.
Then, on the 18th ...
- Fri Apr 12, 2024 4:22 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [<Jackraxxus>] Brickleebale - ban evassaion missunderstanding
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2639
Re: [<Jackraxxus>] Brickleebale - ban evassaion missunderstanding
Ok so let me get the big time story straight:
You have an old account under the Ckey Soulsruined, which gets banned twice for antag rolling, once for 30 days then permanently. You then lose this account and move to Osump.
On Osump, your notes and bans are transferred from Soulsruined, and eventually ...
You have an old account under the Ckey Soulsruined, which gets banned twice for antag rolling, once for 30 days then permanently. You then lose this account and move to Osump.
On Osump, your notes and bans are transferred from Soulsruined, and eventually ...
- Mon Mar 18, 2024 4:31 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Virology healing viruses and jellypeople
- Replies: 19
- Views: 2565
Re: Virology healing viruses and jellypeople
Shouldnt be against the rules but if jellypeople lynch u for it idc
i love lynching viro it's my 3rd favourite thing
i love lynching viro it's my 3rd favourite thing
- Tue Mar 05, 2024 3:55 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Implementatiopn of voting bans.
- Replies: 16
- Views: 2971
Re: Implementatiopn of voting bans.
just make mapvotes only happen at a set time midround ones u can do whenever are stupid
code issue
code issue
- Thu Feb 15, 2024 6:31 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Valentines and the concept of AI laws and revolution
- Replies: 20
- Views: 2701
Re: Valentines and the concept of AI laws and revolution
All loyalties means ALL loyalties.
The solution is to give the an AI an unpurge-able law 0 along the lines of "Protect X, your valentine, at all costs." so that this is made clear.
This would also necessitate the borgs and AI sharing a valentine. Which idk how much freedom of expression people ...
The solution is to give the an AI an unpurge-able law 0 along the lines of "Protect X, your valentine, at all costs." so that this is made clear.
This would also necessitate the borgs and AI sharing a valentine. Which idk how much freedom of expression people ...
- Fri Oct 20, 2023 11:59 pm
- Forum: Admin Feedback
- Topic: Striders13
- Replies: 48
- Views: 20653
- Tue Oct 17, 2023 2:48 pm
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: Silicon Policy is ass
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4211
Re: Silicon Policy is ass
Sounds like silicons should be lawless by default (and unable to be lawed; laws entirely removed) and just behave like regular crewmembers :3
- Wed Oct 11, 2023 4:04 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: proper moth naming policy
- Replies: 13
- Views: 5427
Re: proper moth naming policy
Why are we debating this when the existing policy is more than sufficient?
Moth names MUST be moth-related OR a lamp/lighting pun.
Some acceptable moth-related examples are:
- Moff Tarkin
- Motthew
- Fluttershy
Some acceptable lamp/lighting pun examples are:
- Laemp
- Lightbulb
- Sparky ...
- Wed Oct 11, 2023 2:25 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: proper moth naming policy
- Replies: 13
- Views: 5427
Re: proper moth naming policy
It's in the lore
To allow identification within human society, moths are eventually required to pick their own legally recognized name. Some regard this as a meaningless formality and will pick at random, while others, seeing it as an opportunity to further exploit their amicable appearance, may ...
To allow identification within human society, moths are eventually required to pick their own legally recognized name. Some regard this as a meaningless formality and will pick at random, while others, seeing it as an opportunity to further exploit their amicable appearance, may ...
- Mon Oct 09, 2023 2:10 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Roboticists and AI making pt. 2
- Replies: 24
- Views: 9936
Re: Roboticists and AI making pt. 2
Midround AIs are the least fun thing I will personally send any stinky smelly animal roboticists who make them Jahannam
OP is cooking
OP is cooking
- Tue Aug 08, 2023 8:08 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Add "upon being caught" Rule 5 Subsection 2
- Replies: 29
- Views: 11100
Re: Add "upon being caught" Rule 5 Subsection 2
I think this would be a good change. Not for clarity's sake, but to stop people from baiting themselves into rules-lawyering in PMs and getting dunked harder for it.
"But I was not actually converted tho
I was just cuffed on an offer rune with 2 cultists adjacent to me
"
Death.
"But I was not actually converted tho
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b92d0/b92d0660a0b11f45ba78a214b0389b0f81d48fcd" alt="Sad :("
Death.
- Sat Jul 29, 2023 5:15 am
- Forum: Ideas
- Topic: Buffs to blood brothers
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3040
Re: Buffs to blood brothers
Just make BBs triples only.
Or Fortnite squads.
Or Fortnite squads.
- Fri Jul 28, 2023 7:55 am
- Forum: Off Topic
- Topic: The oppressive HEAT
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4513
Re: The oppressive HEAT
It's winter rn though?
- Mon Jun 26, 2023 12:48 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Friendly antags on MRP, come again?
- Replies: 31
- Views: 6379
Re: Friendly antags on MRP, come again?
lolStriders13 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2023 10:36 am He's not antagonizing them by walking around with his silly modsuit,
Yes that is what I suggested.Striders13 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2023 10:36 am It would probably be easier if rules explicitly permitted killing em.
- Mon Jun 26, 2023 7:09 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Friendly antags on MRP, come again?
- Replies: 31
- Views: 6379
Re: Friendly antags on MRP, come again?
I don't think manuel antags should have the freedom to not antag. It works fine for lrp since any assistant can just decapitate you for existing, but on mrp everyone's hands are tied when dealing with a friendtag. Regular crew got even less options to deal with them than security, and just have to ...
- Sun Jun 25, 2023 3:48 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Friendly antags on MRP, come again?
- Replies: 31
- Views: 6379
Re: Friendly antags on MRP, come again?
How would you write a rule that prevents antagonists from siding with the crew while also maintaining their freedoms per rule 4 so as to not pigeonhole them into one specific admin mandated role? How would that rule not step on toes when nukies/revs/blobs get thrown into the mix?
There shouldn ...
- Sat Jun 24, 2023 6:29 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Friendly antags on MRP, come again?
- Replies: 31
- Views: 6379
Re: Friendly antags on MRP, come again?
Rule 4 is absolute. Just make people who are openly antagonists but doing nothing antagonistic valid, take away whatever protections the MRP rules afford them and then laugh at them when they complain about "shitcurity kill me when I did nothing???" in deadchat.
Antags who aren't advancing the ...
Antags who aren't advancing the ...
- Tue May 30, 2023 1:35 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: The Grand Silicon Policy Rewrite Megathread
- Replies: 128
- Views: 44311
Re: The Grand Silicon Policy Rewrite Megathread
Explicitly making the AI anything is the worst scenario. There should be diversity in AI play.Itseasytosee2me wrote: ↑Tue May 30, 2023 1:21 pm Explicitly making AI's crew sided is the worst case scenerio.
- Fri May 26, 2023 10:14 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: The Grand Silicon Policy Rewrite Megathread
- Replies: 128
- Views: 44311
Re: The Grand Silicon Policy Rewrite Megathread
We should stop being cowards and allow the AI to pick which lawset it wants roundstart as an option under character preferences.
Maybe limit it to no two rounds of the same lawset consecutively, or have it like mapvotes where options are eliminated as they're picked to force diversity.
Think of the ...
Maybe limit it to no two rounds of the same lawset consecutively, or have it like mapvotes where options are eliminated as they're picked to force diversity.
Think of the ...
- Thu May 25, 2023 4:48 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: The Grand Silicon Policy Rewrite Megathread
- Replies: 128
- Views: 44311
Re: The Grand Silicon Policy Rewrite Megathread
Words.
Words that disagree with my words but are very respectable and informed by a great deal of experience with silicon and silicon-adjacent roles.
As one of the few people whose opinions on silicon policy I have a great deal of respect for, I'd like to know why (You) think silicons ...
- Thu May 25, 2023 3:01 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: The Grand Silicon Policy Rewrite Megathread
- Replies: 128
- Views: 44311
Re: The Grand Silicon Policy Rewrite Megathread
digg spacing
The correct opinion.
I disagree, if you're a non human, you should be somewhat fearful of silicons. Human antagonists should be able to rely on the AI/borgs to assist them when antagonizing non humans.
I agree asimov silicons should ASSIST human traitors carrying out the ...
- Thu May 25, 2023 2:36 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: The Grand Silicon Policy Rewrite Megathread
- Replies: 128
- Views: 44311
Re: The Grand Silicon Policy Rewrite Megathread
digg spacing
Those are a whole lot of words, but none of them tell me how the changes they propose game more fun for anyone.
All this is going to do is make people hate silicons, and be justified in doing so.
I don't want my favourite roles to be widely distrusted any more than they already are ...
- Thu May 25, 2023 9:40 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: The Grand Silicon Policy Rewrite Megathread
- Replies: 128
- Views: 44311
Re: The Grand Silicon Policy Rewrite Megathread
silicons are only allowed to get hardstunned, not dish it out.
https://i.ibb.co/2gbHTwt/Robocop.png
I forsee a lot more leaning on the "unreasonable order" clause with the removal of the "stall for a countermand" that everyone seems to agree on.
"AI, murder brigs-the-assistant"
"f1 this is ...
- Tue May 23, 2023 9:19 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: The Grand Silicon Policy Rewrite Megathread
- Replies: 128
- Views: 44311
Re: The Grand Silicon Policy Rewrite Megathread
TL;DR of my post is that you should just HOGAN the default lawset and it would solve all the problems. All of them. Even non-silicon related problems.
Also I wrote this at 6am without proof-reading it or putting any depth of thought into the words written within so I'm probably gonna get home from ...
Also I wrote this at 6am without proof-reading it or putting any depth of thought into the words written within so I'm probably gonna get home from ...
- Thu Apr 20, 2023 6:45 pm
- Forum: Ideas
- Topic: Ghost-betting, Ghost Points (GP) and after-death round interactions
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3343
Re: Ghost-betting, Ghost Points (GP) and after-death round interactions
Not a fan of the round interaction but having the points for bragging rights, and using the achievements system to give it a public leaderboard, sounds like a great idea.
- Tue Apr 18, 2023 4:47 pm
- Forum: Events Workshop
- Topic: Ick Ock/Ock Ick/Metacomming allowed round
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6321
Re: Ick Ock/Ock Ick/Metacomming allowed round
Massive upvote + digg gold.
I think this event idea could be very fun. Screaming "HELP MAINT" in VC with the boys for a round or two sounds like a great way to build up the community.
Only possible downside could be that if 2/3rds of the server are not confident enough/too underage to VC it could ...
I think this event idea could be very fun. Screaming "HELP MAINT" in VC with the boys for a round or two sounds like a great way to build up the community.
Only possible downside could be that if 2/3rds of the server are not confident enough/too underage to VC it could ...